2023
DOI: 10.1002/jat.4534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The toxicological effects of nano titanium dioxide on target organs and mechanisms of toxicity

Congcong Li,
Meng Tang

Abstract: Nano‐titanium dioxide (TiO2NPs) is widely used for its extremely high stability, corrosion resistance, and photocatalytic properties and has penetrated into various fields of production and life. Assessing its toxicity to different organs should be a key part of preclinical toxicity assessment of TiO2NPs, which is relatively incomprehensive yet. Therefore, this review focuses on the toxic effects of TiO2NPs on various organs in mammals and biological mechanisms from different organs. The commonality of toxic e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NPs surface charge, dynamic magnetic susceptibility, iron content, and redox activity contribute to ROS generation, NVU, mitochondria, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) damage and are catalysts for protein misfolding, aggregation, and fibrillation (Calderón-Garcidueñas et al, 2019c). Although superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs (SPIONs) (Wolf et al, 2023) respond to external magnetic fields and are involved in cell damage by agglomeration/clustering, magnetic rotation and/or hyperthermia have been central to our cell damage knowledge in magnetic NPs, and the path mechanisms involving neural NPs damage are extensive (Hu et al, 2011;Mohammadipour et al, 2014;Jung et al, 2019;Li and Tang, 2023;Liu et al, 2023;Srikanth Vallabani et al, 2023;Tang et al, 2023;Wang et al, 2023). To compound the problem, since we are all continuously exposed to polymeric materials, nanoplastics capable of crossing the BBB and the GI barriers have to be included in the brain toxicity list (Kopatz et al, 2023;Zhao et al, 2023;Ziani et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NPs surface charge, dynamic magnetic susceptibility, iron content, and redox activity contribute to ROS generation, NVU, mitochondria, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) damage and are catalysts for protein misfolding, aggregation, and fibrillation (Calderón-Garcidueñas et al, 2019c). Although superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs (SPIONs) (Wolf et al, 2023) respond to external magnetic fields and are involved in cell damage by agglomeration/clustering, magnetic rotation and/or hyperthermia have been central to our cell damage knowledge in magnetic NPs, and the path mechanisms involving neural NPs damage are extensive (Hu et al, 2011;Mohammadipour et al, 2014;Jung et al, 2019;Li and Tang, 2023;Liu et al, 2023;Srikanth Vallabani et al, 2023;Tang et al, 2023;Wang et al, 2023). To compound the problem, since we are all continuously exposed to polymeric materials, nanoplastics capable of crossing the BBB and the GI barriers have to be included in the brain toxicity list (Kopatz et al, 2023;Zhao et al, 2023;Ziani et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential explanation for the observed results is illustrated in Scheme 1 . TiO 2 NPs have a greater capacity to induce the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [ 41 ], leading to oxidative stress in cells [ 8 , 42 , 43 ]. Aggregates of TiO 2 NPs have been shown to induce oxidative stress in zebrafish embryos [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%