2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2046505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Tradeoff between Redistribution and Effort: Evidence from the Field and from the Lab

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most and least productive subjects do not show significantly different behavior, neither in phase 1 nor in phase 2 (all p > 0.1, WRS; diff-in-diff: p = 0.403), suggesting that also the least productive subjects exerted significant amounts of costly overwork, making it highly implausibly that subjects were motivated by inequality aversion. In that sense our finding is in line with Buch and Engel (2012) who also investigate such inequality effects, but do not find empirical support.…”
Section: Inequality Aversionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Most and least productive subjects do not show significantly different behavior, neither in phase 1 nor in phase 2 (all p > 0.1, WRS; diff-in-diff: p = 0.403), suggesting that also the least productive subjects exerted significant amounts of costly overwork, making it highly implausibly that subjects were motivated by inequality aversion. In that sense our finding is in line with Buch and Engel (2012) who also investigate such inequality effects, but do not find empirical support.…”
Section: Inequality Aversionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In our experimental setting, such cost was interpreted as a time-consuming activity that required some ability to be performed. The effort task chosen here was proposed, e.g., by Buch and Engel (2012) and has the appealing feature of being easy to administer in a paper-andpencil experiment, but also complex enough to require people to exert real effort in order to perform it. It consisted in finding how many couples of numbers added up to 10 in 4x4 tables, an example of which is represented in Table 2.…”
Section: Choice Of Effort and The Preferred Tax Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each table had at least one couple adding up to 10, and at most four. The size of the tables was chosen in order to make the task as challenging as possible, and 4x4 was the maximum size presented to subjects in Buch and Engel (2012). In order to allow subjects to correctly understand the task and their abilities in solving the exercises, first, subjects were given ten minutes to practice over the task with 10 tables.…”
Section: Choice Of Effort and The Preferred Tax Ratementioning
confidence: 99%