1974
DOI: 10.2307/2329733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Traditional Approach to Valuing Levered-Growth Stocks: A Clarification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modigliani and Miller (1958) stated that value of a firm is independent of its source of finance, which depends on market efficiency with zero taxes, bankruptcy costs, agency costs, and zero asymmetric information. Haugan and Kumar (1974) rejected the Modigliani-Miller theorem and found the relevance of capital structure to maximize firm value. Subsequently, Viviani (2008) found the significance of capital structure and showed the ways in which an optimal capital structure helps to decrease cost of capital and increase firm value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modigliani and Miller (1958) stated that value of a firm is independent of its source of finance, which depends on market efficiency with zero taxes, bankruptcy costs, agency costs, and zero asymmetric information. Haugan and Kumar (1974) rejected the Modigliani-Miller theorem and found the relevance of capital structure to maximize firm value. Subsequently, Viviani (2008) found the significance of capital structure and showed the ways in which an optimal capital structure helps to decrease cost of capital and increase firm value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ever since Modigliani and Millers landmark 1958 paper, "The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment," many studies have been done on the capital structure theory. Haugan and Kumar (1974) have proven that the irrelevance theory does not hold and that capital structure is very relevant to the firm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By means of a slightly modified version of the traditional model, it has been established in [15], [16], [12] that a dynamic market‐leverage hypothesis of the form (cf. (9) above), normalknormalt=normalknormalu+ƟnormalHnormaltt=1,2,,n …”
Section: Corporate Growth Valuation and Capital Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…and normalknormalt is as hypothesized in (16). With (17), it has been shown, e.g., in [12] that the irrelevance proposition holds for the finite growth firm, if Ɵ=normalknormalui. To interpret, from (17) and (2), normalVL,1normalS1+normalD1=normalVu,1=(normalrg)normalA1normalknormalug[1(1+g1+normalknormalu)normaln]+(1+g1+normalknormalu)normalnnormalA1. …”
Section: Corporate Growth Valuation and Capital Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation