2002
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.349561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Dispute, Territorial Jurisdiction and Global Governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The United States favors sectoral regulation (laws regarding certain sectors, such as health information), free-market incentives, and voluntary actions to protect privacy (see Korbin, 2002). In the transcript of her presentation to the 25th International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners on September 11, 2003, included as an appendix to the annual report, CPO Kelly stated, "I would joyfully and passionately pronounce that while the legislative framework [in the United States] is complex, the enforcement-from a multitude of sources-is tremendous and zealous" (U.S. Department, 2004, Appendix D, p. 4).…”
Section: Analysis Of the First Annual Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The United States favors sectoral regulation (laws regarding certain sectors, such as health information), free-market incentives, and voluntary actions to protect privacy (see Korbin, 2002). In the transcript of her presentation to the 25th International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners on September 11, 2003, included as an appendix to the annual report, CPO Kelly stated, "I would joyfully and passionately pronounce that while the legislative framework [in the United States] is complex, the enforcement-from a multitude of sources-is tremendous and zealous" (U.S. Department, 2004, Appendix D, p. 4).…”
Section: Analysis Of the First Annual Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These comments refer to the fact that the United States is currently in the midst of a protracted dispute with the 27-nation European Union as well as with other nations because the United States does not share the idea common to other developed nations that data privacy is a fundamental right that should be protected by law. The United States favors sectoral regulation (laws regarding certain sectors, such as health information), free-market incentives, and voluntary actions to protect privacy (see Korbin, 2002). In the transcript of her presentation to the 25th International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners on September 11, 2003, included as an appendix to the annual report, CPO Kelly stated, "I would joyfully and passionately pronounce that while the legislative framework [in the United States] is complex, the enforcement-from a multitude of sources-is tremendous and zealous" (U.S. Department, 2004, Appendix D, p. 4).…”
Section: Analysis Of the First Annual Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Korbin has argued that because a single website's business touches down in computers located throughout the world, every website owner "is, at least potentially, subject to regulation emanating from every jurisdiction in the world." [12] Already Spain and Portugal have levied millions of dollars of fines under the EUDPD and Sweden forced the Swedish affiliate of Dun and Bradstreet to discontinue transfer of personal information about Swedish customers to U.S. headquarters [9].…”
Section: Legal Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%