The Transcription Bubble of the RNA Polymerase–Promoter Open Complex Exhibits Conformational Heterogeneity and Millisecond-Scale Dynamics: Implications for Transcription Start-Site Selection

Self Cite

During transcription initiation, RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme unwinds ∼13 bp of promoter DNA, forming an RNAP-promoter open complex (RPo) containing a single-stranded transcription bubble, and selects a template-strand nucleotide to serve as the transcription start site (TSS). In RPo, RNAP core enzyme makes sequence-specific protein-DNA interactions with the downstream part of the nontemplate strand of the transcription bubble ("core recognition element," CRE). Here, we investigated whether sequence-specific RNAP-CRE interactions affect TSS selection. To do this, we used two next-generation sequencing-based approaches to compare the TSS profile of WT RNAP to that of an RNAP derivative defective in sequence-specific RNAP-CRE interactions. First, using massively systematic transcript end readout, MASTER, we assessed effects of RNAP-CRE interactions on TSS selection in vitro and in vivo for a library of 4 7 (∼16,000) consensus promoters containing different TSS region sequences, and we observed that the TSS profile of the RNAP derivative defective in RNAP-CRE interactions differed from that of WT RNAP, in a manner that correlated with the presence of consensus CRE sequences in the TSS region. Second, using 5′ merodiploid nativeelongating-transcript sequencing, 5′ mNET-seq, we assessed effects of RNAP-CRE interactions at natural promoters in Escherichia coli, and we identified 39 promoters at which RNAP-CRE interactions determine TSS selection. Our findings establish RNAP-CRE interactions are a functional determinant of TSS selection. We propose that RNAP-CRE interactions modulate the position of the downstream end of the transcription bubble in RPo, and thereby modulate TSS selection, which involves transcription bubble expansion or transcription bubble contraction (scrunching or antiscrunching).RNA polymerase | transcription start site selection | promoter | transcription bubble | transcription initiation T ranscription initiation consists of a number of biochemical steps leading to formation of a phosphodiester bond between a nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) bound in the RNA polymerase (RNAP) active-center initiating NTP binding site (i site) and an NTP bound in the RNAP active-center extending NTP binding site (i+1 site) (1-3). For bacterial RNAP, promoter-specific initiation requires the RNAP core enzyme (subunit composition α 2 ββ'ω) to associate with a σ factor forming the RNAP holoenzyme (subunit composition α 2 ββ'ωσ). The σ factor contains determinants for sequence-specific protein-DNA interactions with four core promoter elements: the −35 element, the extended −10 element, the −10 element, and the discriminator element (4).During transcription initiation, RNAP holoenzyme unwinds promoter DNA to form an RNAP-promoter open complex (RPo) containing an unwound, single-stranded "transcription bubble." The process of promoter unwinding begins within the promoter −10 element and propagates downstream, enabling single-stranded nucleotides at the downstream end of the transcription bubble template strand to occup...

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Interactions between RNA polymerase and the core recognition element are a determinant of transcription start site selection

Vvedenskaya

Vahedian-Movahed

Zhang

et al. 2016

Self Cite

“…Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) has proven to be powerful for dissecting the mechanisms of transcription initiation and elongation by RNAP at optimal promoters (20,21). Here we report a smFRET study of how CueR-a Cu + -responsive MerRfamily metalloregulator-modulates RNAP interactions with CueR's cognate suboptimal promoter and how RNAP in turn affects CueR-promoter interactions for transcription regulation.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Metalloregulator CueR biases RNA polymerase’s kinetic sampling of dead-end or open complex to repress or activate transcription

Martell

Joshi

Gaballa

et al. 2015

Metalloregulators respond to metal ions to regulate transcription of metal homeostasis genes. MerR-family metalloregulators act on σ 70 -dependent suboptimal promoters and operate via a unique DNA distortion mechanism in which both the apo and holo forms of the regulators bind tightly to their operator sequence, distorting DNA structure and leading to transcription repression or activation, respectively. It remains unclear how these metalloregulator−DNA interactions are coupled dynamically to RNA polymerase (RNAP) interactions with DNA for transcription regulation. Using single-molecule FRET, we study how the copper efflux regulator (CueR)-a Cu + -responsive MerR-family metalloregulator-modulates RNAP interactions with CueR's cognate suboptimal promoter PcopA, and how RNAP affects CueR−PcopA interactions. We find that RNAP can form two noninterconverting complexes at PcopA in the absence of nucleotides: a dead-end complex and an open complex, constituting a branched interaction pathway that is distinct from the linear pathway prevalent for transcription initiation at optimal promoters. Capitalizing on this branched pathway, CueR operates via a "biased sampling" instead of "dynamic equilibrium shifting" mechanism in regulating transcription initiation; it modulates RNAP's binding-unbinding kinetics, without allowing interconversions between the deadend and open complexes. Instead, the apo-repressor form reinforces the dominance of the dead-end complex to repress transcription, and the holo-activator form shifts the interactions toward the open complex to activate transcription. RNAP, in turn, locks CueR binding at PcopA into its specific binding mode, likely helping amplify the differences between apo-and holo-CueR in imposing DNA structural changes. Therefore, RNAP and CueR work synergistically in regulating transcription.single-molecule FRET | protein-DNA interaction dynamics | MerR-family regulators | metal-responsive transcription regulation M aintaining cellular metal homeostasis is essential for bacteria, which often dwell in environments with high concentrations of metals. Some of these metals are purely toxic to bacteria, such as Cd and Hg. Many others are required for cellular function, such as Zn and Cu, but can be toxic in excess. Cells have thus developed many ways to regulate intracellular metal concentrations (1-9). Metal-responsive transcriptional regulation is one of them, where metalloregulators respond to intracellular metal ions and regulate transcription of metal efflux, uptake, or other metal homeostasis genes (4-9).In Gram-negative bacteria, MerR-family metalloregulators act on σ 70 -dependent suboptimal promoters to repress or activate transcription of metal resistance genes (7,8). These suboptimal promoters have elongated spacing, 19-20 bp (Fig. 1), compared with the optimal 17 ± 1 bp, between the −35 and −10 elements. This elongated spacing causes a misalignment of these two recognition elements, impairing proper interactions with the RNA polymerase (RNAP) and leading to a weak basal leve...

“…A recent single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer study showed there can be heterogeneity in transcription bubble size in open complexes, even for an individual promoter (8). Thus, spontaneous bubble expansion and contraction can account for multiple start sites at some promoters.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Open complex scrunching before nucleotide addition accounts for the unusual transcription start site of E. coli ribosomal RNA promoters

Winkelman

Chandrangsu

Ross

et al. 2016

Most Escherichia coli promoters initiate transcription with a purine 7 or 8 nt downstream from the -10 hexamer, but some promoters, including the ribosomal RNA promoter rrnB P1, start 9 nt from the -10 element. We identified promoter and RNA polymerase determinants of this noncanonical rrnB P1 start site using biochemical and genetic approaches including mutational analysis of the promoter, Fe 2+ cleavage assays to monitor template strand positions near the active-site, and Bpa cross-linking to map the path of open complex DNA at amino acid and nucleotide resolution. We find that mutations in several promoter regions affect transcription start site (TSS) selection. In particular, we show that the absence of strong interactions between the discriminator region and σ region 1.2 and between the extended -10 element and σ region 3.0, identified previously as a determinant of proper regulation of rRNA promoters, is also required for the unusual TSS. We find that the DNA in the single-stranded transcription bubble of the rrnB P1 promoter complex expands and is "scrunched" into the active site channel of RNA polymerase, similar to the situation in initial transcribing complexes. However, in the rrnB P1 open complex, scrunching occurs before RNA synthesis begins. We find that the scrunched open complex exhibits reduced abortive product synthesis, suggesting that scrunching and unusual TSS selection contribute to the extraordinary transcriptional activity of rRNA promoters by increasing promoter escape, helping to offset the reduction in promoter activity that would result from the weak interactions with σ. T o initiate transcription, RNA polymerase (RNAP) and promoter DNA participate in a multistep binding reaction that results in unwinding of at least one turn of DNA and placement of the template strand into the active site. Once positioned, the initiating nucleoside triphosphate and the second NTP pair with the template, and the first phosphodiester bond is catalyzed.There is considerable information about the structure of open complexes and the position of the transcription start site (TSS) for consensus promoters and engineered scaffolds. However, perfect consensus promoters are not actually found in wild-type Escherichia coli cells, and little is known about TSS selection on native promoters and about how variation in promoter sequence affects TSS position. Comparison of the TSS for natural and synthetic Eσ 70 -dependent promoters indicates that a purine 7-8 bp downstream from the last base in the -10 element is typically used for initiation, and in some cases, two or more adjacent positions in an individual promoter are used (1-3). A pyrimidine at nontemplate strand position −1 is preferred (Fig. 1A), because the corresponding purine on the template strand makes favorable stacking interactions with the initiating NTP (4). Transcripts initiating as far as 12 bp downstream from the -10 hexamer have been reported but are very uncommon (5, 6). Changes in nucleotide concentrations alter the TSS at some promoters, and t...