2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0984-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transcription factors Hsf1 and Msn2 of thermotolerant Kluyveromyces marxianus promote cell growth and ethanol fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at high temperatures

Abstract: BackgroundHigh temperature inhibits cell growth and ethanol fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. As a complex phenotype, thermotolerance usually involves synergistic actions of many genes, thereby being difficult to engineer. The overexpression of either endogenous or exogenous stress-related transcription factor genes in yeasts was found to be able to improve relevant stress tolerance of the hosts.ResultsTo increase ethanol yield of high-temperature fermentation, we constructed a series of strains of S. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…86,87 We speculate that the function of MSN2 in K. marxianus might not relate to the inhibitors tolerance or phosphorylation of MSN2 was more important in regulating the genes in response to the multiple inhibitors stress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…86,87 We speculate that the function of MSN2 in K. marxianus might not relate to the inhibitors tolerance or phosphorylation of MSN2 was more important in regulating the genes in response to the multiple inhibitors stress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In our previous study, we have found that heterologous expression of K. marxianus HSF1 and MSN2 (denoted as KmHSF1 and KmMSN2 , respectively) in S. cerevisiae promoted cell growth and ethanol fermentation at high temperatures (Li et al ., ). RNA‐Seq‐based transcriptomic analysis revealed that heterologous expression of KmHSF1 and KmMSN2 in S. cerevisiae resulted in 31 and 32 up‐regulated genes, respectively (Fold change > 2, P adj < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the fold change of OLE1 up‐regulation was relatively low, OLE1 ‐overexpressing strain could be enriched after high‐temperature screening, indicating that this level of up‐regulation was sufficient to cause phenotype change. Given that OLE1 was up‐regulated by 1.65‐fold in the strain overexpressing KmMSN2 based on the RNA‐Seq results in our previous study (Li et al ., ), the activation of OLE1 based on the dCas9‐VP64 fusion and g OLE1 _1 in this study is comparable to that by KmMSN2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations