2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.12.027
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transfer of 137 Cs, Pu isotopes and 90 Sr to bird, bat and ground-dwelling small mammal species within the Chernobyl exclusion zone

Abstract: Protected species are the focus of many radiological environmental assessments. However, the lack of radioecological data for many protected species presents a significant international challenge. Furthermore, there are legislative restrictions on destructive sampling of protected species to obtain such data. Where data are not available, extrapolations are often made from 'similar' species but there has been little attempt to validate this approach. In this paper we present what, to our knowledge, is the firs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Animals were live-monitored to determine whole-body radionuclide activity concentrations and hence enable estimation of internal dose. While there is a potential for some external contamination (of skin and fur) to influence live-monitoring results, skinned carcasses and whole animal live-monitoring data from some of our previous small mammal studies in the CEZ (Beresford et al, 2008(Beresford et al, , 2016 demonstrate that surface contamination makes a negligible contribution to the whole-body activity concentration measurements obtained via live monitoring. Consequently, this is not a significant source of uncertainty for the present study.…”
Section: How Do Ambient Dose Rates Compare To Total Absorbed Dose Rates?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Animals were live-monitored to determine whole-body radionuclide activity concentrations and hence enable estimation of internal dose. While there is a potential for some external contamination (of skin and fur) to influence live-monitoring results, skinned carcasses and whole animal live-monitoring data from some of our previous small mammal studies in the CEZ (Beresford et al, 2008(Beresford et al, , 2016 demonstrate that surface contamination makes a negligible contribution to the whole-body activity concentration measurements obtained via live monitoring. Consequently, this is not a significant source of uncertainty for the present study.…”
Section: How Do Ambient Dose Rates Compare To Total Absorbed Dose Rates?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This approximation is valid because 40 K, 60 Co, 134 Cs, 154 Eu, 238,239,240 Pu and 241 Am concentrations in soil were lower by 2-3 orders of magnitude than 90 Sr and 137 Cs (Gaschak et al, 2011). The bioavailability of actinides to small mammals is low (Beresford et al, 2016) and, at present, 90 Sr and 137 Cs are the main contributors to the total dose rate experienced by small mammals in the Red Forest (Beresford et al, 2019).…”
Section: Characterisation Of the Radiological Exposurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…This organization is an important funder of universities and other institutions engaged in research in environmental science. For example, both the dataset from research on vertebrates from the Chernobyl exclusion zone (Gaschak et al 2018) and information about research projects that utilized the data (STAR database 2013; Barnett 2009 et al;Beresford et al 2011;Beresford et al 2008;Beresford et al 2016) are available via NERC through Open Government License. The data is accessible through the STORE database as well.…”
Section: Other Environmental Information Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%