1997
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1997.84.3.784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Transfer Paradox: Effects of Contextual Interference on Retention and Transfer Performance of a Complex Cognitive Skill

Abstract: In an exploratory study, the effects of contextual interference on retention and transfer performance were studied for learning a complex cognitive skill, namely, troubleshooting a computer-based simulation of a chemical process plant. Support was found for the “transfer paradox”: high contextual interference had negative effects on performance during practice and none on number of retention problems solved after the training but positive effects on number of new problems solved (transfer). Implications for th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, CLT does not contradict the common finding that whole-task sequencing is more suitable than part-task sequencing for tasks with a high level of integration and coordination (for reviews, see Goettl and Shute, 1996;Peck and Detweiler, 2000; van Merriënboer, 1997). Both sequencing techniques work from less to more interacting elements, but part-task sequencing practice does so by progressing from part-tasks to the whole task, whereas whole-task sequencing does so by progressing from simplified versions to more complex versions of the whole task.…”
Section: Knowledge Progression and Intrinsic Cognitive Loadmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, CLT does not contradict the common finding that whole-task sequencing is more suitable than part-task sequencing for tasks with a high level of integration and coordination (for reviews, see Goettl and Shute, 1996;Peck and Detweiler, 2000; van Merriënboer, 1997). Both sequencing techniques work from less to more interacting elements, but part-task sequencing practice does so by progressing from part-tasks to the whole task, whereas whole-task sequencing does so by progressing from simplified versions to more complex versions of the whole task.…”
Section: Knowledge Progression and Intrinsic Cognitive Loadmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Pollock et al (2002) did not give specific guidelines indicating the points at which interacting elements should be converted into isolated elements, but a study of their instructional materials suggests that their isolated information elements are really sets of interactions that are already familiar to the learners. Reigeluth (1999) and van Merriënboer (1997) suggested a slightly different sequencing technique that focuses, in the early phases of learning, on those elements that are most fundamental and representative for the whole complex task. Focusing on fundamental elements should allow the learners to obtain a quick impression of the whole task that can be further elaborated in the course of the training program.…”
Section: Knowledge Progression and Intrinsic Cognitive Loadmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In others (Group 2), this ability may not be spontaneous for a variety of reasons, including low cognitive ability, disengagement, and so forth. Regardless, it might be good instructional-design practice to explicitly juxtapose high-variability concepts, as Paas and Van Merriënboer (1994b) and van Merriënboer, de Croock, and Jelsma (1997) have suggested. Additionally, more research needs to be conducted to understand whether explicit statements about problem differences and similarities that accompanied a connected set of instructional elements could raise the performance of Group-2-like participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have developed a taxonomy to classify different types of transfers [Gagne et al 1948;Barnett and Ceci 2002]. Two types of transfers that are frequently discussed are immediate (near) transfer and delayed (far) transfer [Fong and Nisbett 1991;Merrienboer et al 1997]. Near transfer is transfer of knowledge and skills from one context to a closely related context, while far transfer is transfer of skill from one context to an entirely different context.…”
Section: Measuring Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%