2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Transition of a Type IIL Supernova into a Supernova Remnant: Late-time Observations of SN 2013by

Abstract: We present early-time Swift and Chandra X-ray data along with late-time optical and near-infrared observations of SN 2013by, a Type IIL supernova (SN) that occurred in the nearby spiral galaxy ESO 138−G10 (D ∼ 14.8 Mpc). Optical and NIR photometry and spectroscopy follow the late-time evolution of the supernova from days +89 to +457 post-maximum brightness. The optical spectra and X-ray light curves are consistent with the picture of a SN having prolonged interaction with circumstellar material (CSM) that acce… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This 'bridge' has been seen before in both SNe IIL (e.g. 2013by; Black et al 2017 and2014G;Terreran et al 2016) and SNe IIb (e.g. SN 1993J;Matheson et al 2000).…”
Section: Late Phasessupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This 'bridge' has been seen before in both SNe IIL (e.g. 2013by; Black et al 2017 and2014G;Terreran et al 2016) and SNe IIb (e.g. SN 1993J;Matheson et al 2000).…”
Section: Late Phasessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…For this reason, we will compare SN 2017ivv to both fast-declining SNe II and SNe IIb with well-sampled light curves and some spectra during both the photospheric and nebular phase. The fast-declining SN II group consists of ASASSN-15oz (Bostroem et al 2019), SN 2014G (Terreran et al 2016), SN 2013ej (Valenti et al 2014;Huang et al 2015;Yuan et al 2016), and SN 2013by (Valenti et al 2015;Black et al 2017), while the SNe IIb sample consists of SN 2015as (Gangopadhyay et al 2018), SN 2013df (Morales-Garoffolo et al 2014;Szalai et al 2016), SN 2011hs (Bufano et al 2014), SN 2011dh (Arcavi et al 2011;Sahu et al 2013;Ergon et al 2014), SN 2008ax (Pastorello et al 2008Taubenberger et al 2011;Modjaz et al 2014), and SN 1993J (Barbon et al 1995;Matheson et al 2000). Because of the extremely low luminosity of the host of SN 2017ivv, we also include SN 2015bs (Anderson et al 2018), which is a slow-declining SN II that exploded in the faintest host galaxy found before SN 2017ivv.…”
Section: Light-curve Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason we will compare SN 2017ivv to both fast-declining SNe II and SNe IIb with well-sampled light curves and some spectra during both the photospheric and nebular phase. The fast-declining SN II group consists of ASASSN-15oz (Bostroem et al 2019), SN 2014G (Terreran et al 2016), SN 2013ej (Valenti et al 2014Huang et al 2015;Yuan et al 2016), and SN 2013by (Valenti et al 2015Black et al 2017), while the SNe IIb sample consists of SN 2015as (Gangopadhyay et al 2018), SN 2013df (Morales-Garoffolo et al 2014Szalai et al 2016), SN 2011hs (Bufano et al 2014), SN 2011dh (Arcavi et al 2011Sahu et al 2013;Ergon et al 2014Ergon et al , 2015, SN 2008ax (Pastorello et al 2008;Taubenberger et al 2011;Modjaz et al 2014), and SN 1993J (Barbon et al 1995Matheson et al 2000). Because of the extremely low luminosity of the host of SN 2017ivv, we also include SN 2015bs (Anderson et al 2018), which is a slow-declining SN II that exploded in the faintest host galaxy found before SN 2017ivv.…”
Section: Light Curve Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signatures of ejecta-CSM interactions have been observed in a few SNe II-L/P before ∼ 500 days: SN 2007od (Andrews et al 2010), SN 2004dj (Andrews et al 2016), PTF11iqb (Smith et al 2015), SN 2011ja (Andrews et al 2016), SN 2013by (Black et al 2017), and SN 2017gmr (Andrews et al 2019). However, boxlike emission profiles indicating ejecta-CSM interaction with CSM shells have only been observed for three SNe II-P, and in these cases the ejecta-CSM interaction was observed after ∼ 800 days: SN 2004et (Kotak et al 2009;Maguire et al 2010), SN 2013ej (Mauerhan et al 2017, and iPTF14hls (Andrews & Smith 2018;Sollerman et al 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%