2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1698612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Transmission of the Global Financial Crisis to the Italian Economy: A Counterfactual Analysis, 2008-2010

Abstract: La recessione mondiale innescata dalla crisi finanziaria si è ripercossa con straordinaria violenza sull'attività economica dell'Italia. Qual è stato il contributo dei diversi canali mediante i quali la crisi si è trasmessa alla nostra economia? Quali sono stati gli effetti delle reazioni delle politiche economiche? Per dare risposta a questi interrogativi, in questo lavoro viene realizzata un'indagine controfattuale dell'evoluzione dell'economia italiana nell'arco temporale 2008-2010, esplorando scenari coere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Credit restrictions of a magnitude similar to what was on average observed in 2008-2009 exert a sizable negative impact on investment, ranging between 6 and 8 per cent after two years. This result appears broadly in line with the estimates reported in Panetta and Signoretti (2010) and Caivano et al (2010), where several different ways of identifying the effects of the credit supply restrictions of 2008-2009 were considered. 20 As regards the effects of shocks in output, the 'accelerator' is found to reach a peak in the second year when the elasticity of investment to output is between 1.5 and 1.8; the elasticity then gradually returns to 1 following the long term constraint imposed, and tested, in the model.…”
Section: Sourcesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Credit restrictions of a magnitude similar to what was on average observed in 2008-2009 exert a sizable negative impact on investment, ranging between 6 and 8 per cent after two years. This result appears broadly in line with the estimates reported in Panetta and Signoretti (2010) and Caivano et al (2010), where several different ways of identifying the effects of the credit supply restrictions of 2008-2009 were considered. 20 As regards the effects of shocks in output, the 'accelerator' is found to reach a peak in the second year when the elasticity of investment to output is between 1.5 and 1.8; the elasticity then gradually returns to 1 following the long term constraint imposed, and tested, in the model.…”
Section: Sourcesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…19 Credit restrictions of a magnitude similar to what was on average observed in 2008-09 exert a sizable negative impact on investment, ranging between 6 and 8 per cent after two years. This result appears broadly in line with the estimates reported in Panetta and Signoretti (2010) and Caivano, Rodano and Siviero (2010), where several different ways of identifying the effects of the credit supply restrictions of 2008-09 were considered. 20…”
Section: A Aggregate Estimates For Private Sector Non-constructionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The table reports the frequency of individual banks' answers concerning supply conditions and their assessments of demand developments; all answers refer to the changes in the previous 3 months. 7 2 Related evidence is provided by Panetta and Signoretti (2010), who present a broad discussion of the relative role of supply and demand factors in credit developments in Italy during the crisis, and by Caivano et al (2010) and Gaiotti (2011), who estimate the impact of credit supply factors on firms' investment decisions and economic growth in Italy, also focusing on the crisis period.…”
Section: Bls Indicators and Lending To Enterprises In Italy: Data Andmentioning
confidence: 99%