2019
DOI: 10.1093/ons/opz358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Transpalpebral Versus the Transciliary Variant of the Supraorbital Keyhole Approach: Anatomic Concepts for Aneurysm Surgery

Abstract: BACKGROUND The supraorbital craniotomy (SOC) is classically performed through a skin incision in the patient's eyebrow. A variant with a skin incision in the patient's eyelid has become increasingly popular in recent years. OBJECTIVE To compare the transpalpebral and the transciliary variants of the SOC with regard to their potential role in aneurysm surgery. METHODS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a cadaveric study by Rychen and colleagues, the authors found that addition of orbital rim osteotomy to a trans-eyebrow approach increased the vertical extent of the craniotomy from 1.5 to 2.5 cm. 132 Cavalcanti and colleagues performed supraorbital keyhole craniotomy on cadaveric heads and found that addition of orbital rim osteotomy significantly increased surgical freedom and working angles to common sites of anterior circulation aneurysms, with the greatest increases for anterior communicating artery and posterior communicating artery targets. 135 Rychen and colleagues reported that the transpalpebral approach requires removal of the orbital rim, because without orbital osteotomy the skin can be retracted superiorly to provide only 0.5 cm of vertical working space, but a trans-eyebrow approach without additional orbital rim osteotomy affords wider working angles toward the anterior clinoid process compared with the transpalpebral approach with orbital rim osteotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a cadaveric study by Rychen and colleagues, the authors found that addition of orbital rim osteotomy to a trans-eyebrow approach increased the vertical extent of the craniotomy from 1.5 to 2.5 cm. 132 Cavalcanti and colleagues performed supraorbital keyhole craniotomy on cadaveric heads and found that addition of orbital rim osteotomy significantly increased surgical freedom and working angles to common sites of anterior circulation aneurysms, with the greatest increases for anterior communicating artery and posterior communicating artery targets. 135 Rychen and colleagues reported that the transpalpebral approach requires removal of the orbital rim, because without orbital osteotomy the skin can be retracted superiorly to provide only 0.5 cm of vertical working space, but a trans-eyebrow approach without additional orbital rim osteotomy affords wider working angles toward the anterior clinoid process compared with the transpalpebral approach with orbital rim osteotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…135 Rychen and colleagues reported that the transpalpebral approach requires removal of the orbital rim, because without orbital osteotomy the skin can be retracted superiorly to provide only 0.5 cm of vertical working space, but a trans-eyebrow approach without additional orbital rim osteotomy affords wider working angles toward the anterior clinoid process compared with the transpalpebral approach with orbital rim osteotomy. 132 Despite the increased working angles afforded by this modification, orbital osteotomy is infrequently used and was reported in only 8.1% of cases. In our recent systematic review of supraorbital keyhole craniotomy via eyebrow incision, an 83.6% technical success rate, defined as gross total tumor resection or complete aneurysm obliteration via clipping, was achieved despite rare inclusion of orbital osteotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33,34 This approach, often performed with the expertise of an oculoplastic or craniofacial surgeon present, offers good cosmetic outcomes with the scar hidden in the eyelid crease. 32,33 Rychen et al 35 compare the transpalpebral and supraciliary approach with the use of cadavers and virtual craniotomies, finding that the transpalpebral approach restricts the craniocaudal working angle during surgery. This study reported excellent cosmetic outcomes with both approaches but mentioned that the transpalpebral approach may have superior outcomes in older patients with thinning eyebrows and more pronounced supratarsal folds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By going through a transcranial route, we circumvented these problems and were able to achieve wide fenestration into multiple basal cisterns. [7][8][9] In this video, we discussed how the goal of surgery, the particular characteristics of the lesion, and anatomic features of the patient should dictate the surgical approach. The patient consented to the procedure and to the publication of her images.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%