2009
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00324.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transport of LDL across the deformable arterial wall: the effect of endothelial cell turnover and intimal deformation under hypertension

Abstract: A multilayered model of the aortic wall is introduced to investigate the transport of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) under hypertension, taking into account the influences of increased endothelial cell turnover and deformation of the intima at higher pressure. Meanwhile, the thickness and properties of the endothelium, intima, internal elastic lamina (IEL), and media are affected by the transmural pressure. The LDL macromolecules enter the intima through leaky junctions over the endothelium, which are created b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct measurement of medial permeability, and other regions of the arterial wall for that matter, is di cult, if not impossible; hence, modelling this layer can provide valuable information. In previous models, the medial structure has been treated as either an array of circles (Wang and Tarbell, 1995, Huang and Tarbell, 1997, Tada and Tarbell, 2000, Dabagh et al, 2009a or as a homogenous medium with an e↵ective permeability typically derived from the former approaches (Prosi et al, 2005, Ai and Vafai, 2006, Sun et al, 2009, Dabagh et al, 2009b. The array of circles, although useful, assumes that the media contains a regular arrangement of SMCs and neglects the influence of the elastic lamellae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Direct measurement of medial permeability, and other regions of the arterial wall for that matter, is di cult, if not impossible; hence, modelling this layer can provide valuable information. In previous models, the medial structure has been treated as either an array of circles (Wang and Tarbell, 1995, Huang and Tarbell, 1997, Tada and Tarbell, 2000, Dabagh et al, 2009a or as a homogenous medium with an e↵ective permeability typically derived from the former approaches (Prosi et al, 2005, Ai and Vafai, 2006, Sun et al, 2009, Dabagh et al, 2009b. The array of circles, although useful, assumes that the media contains a regular arrangement of SMCs and neglects the influence of the elastic lamellae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the widely accepted view is in fact correct our methods would still be applicable; the relative permeabilities (and hence the detailed results) would be qualitatively similar but would di↵er in detail. Previous models of the media have reported the permeability of the GS to be around 6.09⇥10 19 m 2 (see for example Dabagh et al (2009b) ( 5 -8 ) of SMCs between the lamellae. The size of the blocks varied so they only contained GS and SMCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The local transport of several substances near and at the vessel wall are known to influence atherosclerosis progression [56]. For example, previous studies have looked into transport of low density lipoproteins (LDL) [17,20,30,14], high density lipoproteins (HDL) [40,24], oxygen [16,27], nitric oxide (NO) [45,35], monocytes [12,14], and adenine triphosphate ATP and adenine diphosphate ADP [13,15,8] as important mass transport processes involved in atherosclerosis.Intravascular thrombosis is another compelling pathology associated with most cardiovascular diseases where near-wall transport becomes important [7,25]. The trajectories of individual platelets and the accumulation and residence time of chemical solutes including ADP, thrombin, and various blood factors control clot formation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the interfinger distance is 1 mm and the density of ADJs is 1 mm 22 [59 -61]. ADJs are located at 25% of the cleft depth or 250 nm from the apical surface [36,73]. The shape, location and distribution of ADJs in the cell -cell interface in this model are shown in figure 1d.…”
Section: Geometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%