2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14164982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Transposition of Energy Communities into Swedish Regulations: Overview and Critique of Emerging Regulations

Abstract: One organizational innovation introduced by the clean energy for all Europeans package (CEP) is that of the energy community (EC), including the renewable energy community (REC) and citizen energy community (CEC). The translation of related directives into national legislation is underway in Sweden, and the Swedish Energy Market Inspectorate (Ei) has proposed a new law on ECs, which has been sent for consultation. This article analyzes the Ei proposal and the responses from the 27 referral bodies commenting on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An artificial differentiation, strictly focussing on a 1:1 transposition could, depending on the context, lead to potentially inefficient overlaps or competing frameworks and a plethora of different mechanisms. For instance, while we identified a high degree of integration with pre-existing legal concepts in previous research (e.g., in [19] for Ireland), the Swedish draft for an energy community framework was criticised for not clarifying the relationship between existing cooperatives and the new energy community concepts [55]. An important criterion for the chosen approach may thus include the recognition of pre-existing initiatives, with the aim of integrating these in the best way into the new frameworks [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An artificial differentiation, strictly focussing on a 1:1 transposition could, depending on the context, lead to potentially inefficient overlaps or competing frameworks and a plethora of different mechanisms. For instance, while we identified a high degree of integration with pre-existing legal concepts in previous research (e.g., in [19] for Ireland), the Swedish draft for an energy community framework was criticised for not clarifying the relationship between existing cooperatives and the new energy community concepts [55]. An important criterion for the chosen approach may thus include the recognition of pre-existing initiatives, with the aim of integrating these in the best way into the new frameworks [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In research, the definition of ECs is unclear to this day, and an abundance of versions exist with minor differences in names, such as community energy (Bauwens and Devine-Wright, 2018;Brummer, 2018;Ehrtmann et al, 2021), community renewable energy (Mirzania et al, 2019;Rahmani et al, 2020), local renewable energy communities (Wagemans et al, 2019), or energy communities (Gjorgievski et al, 2021;Palm, 2021a;Papatsounis et al, 2022). The lack of one clear, universally accepted definition (Bauwens et al, 2022) (Palm, 2021b). Within Germany, the most commonly used term, citizen energy (Bürgerenergie), is equally vaguely defined.…”
Section: Energy Communities-earlier Research and Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are mainly implemented by renewable energy communities that have been developing in many countries for many years. They are particularly popular in Germany [10,11], Denmark [12], Austria [13], Sweden [14] and in Switzerland (EnergieSchweiz, 2019 [15]). They function in various legal forms, such as energy cooperatives, foundations and associations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%