1999
DOI: 10.1080/08870449908407339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transtheoretical model of behaviour change: Are the stages qualitatively different?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, Herzog and Blagg's (2007) data show a different pattern to ours and it would be valuable to clarify where these differences lie in future research, for example, between: US versus UK smokers, passive versus proactive recruitment of participants, single-item versus multiple-item measures of motivation, and samples with 68% women versus 51% women (see also Etter & Sutton, 2002;Kraft et al, 1999;Quinlan & McCaul, 2000;Sciamanna et al, 2000).…”
Section: Stages Of Change and Targeting Interventions 19mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clearly, Herzog and Blagg's (2007) data show a different pattern to ours and it would be valuable to clarify where these differences lie in future research, for example, between: US versus UK smokers, passive versus proactive recruitment of participants, single-item versus multiple-item measures of motivation, and samples with 68% women versus 51% women (see also Etter & Sutton, 2002;Kraft et al, 1999;Quinlan & McCaul, 2000;Sciamanna et al, 2000).…”
Section: Stages Of Change and Targeting Interventions 19mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…First, common among most of the supporting studies they cite, Herzog and Blagg (2007) tested the stage of change algorithm against single item measures of motivation (see also Etter & Sutton, 2002;Kraft, Sutton, & Reynolds, 1999;Sciamanna, Hoch, Duke, Fogle, & Ford, 2000), raising questions about the reliability of the motivational measures used to question the validity of the staging algorithm. Second, it is plausible that Herzog and Blagg's (2007) participants may have been more motivated than smokers in the population at large because they recruited Stages of change and targeting interventions 7 smokers through "newspaper advertisements and flyers distributed at community events" (p. 224) and paid participants $25 for completing the questionnaire as opposed to proactively recruiting participants from the community (cf.…”
Section: Stages Of Change and Targeting Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies assessing the validity of measures of intention to quit smoking have been conducted for the Stages of Change and these have found mixed results [19][20][21][22][23] . Studies about the validity of the MTSS have found a good predictive validity of the instrument 13,14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongemotiveerden zien geen of weinig redenen om te stoppen (zie voor een overzichtsstudie Kraft, Sutton, McCreath Reynolds, 1999). Daarom moeten zij meer voordelen van stoppen gaan zien om in fase vooruit te gaan.…”
Section: De Onderhavige Studieunclassified
“…Overwegers verwachten al wel voordelen van stoppen, dat is immers de reden dat ze overwegen te stoppen (Kraft et al, 1999). Maar overwegers stellen het stoppen ondanks dat uit omdat ze (nog) veel voordelen van roken zien; roken heeft nog belangrijke functies voor hen (Miller & Rollnick, 1991).…”
Section: De Onderhavige Studieunclassified