The Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Extraperitoneal Approach for Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy: A Technique Note and Feasibility Study

Abstract

BackgroundNowadays, lymphadenectomy could be performed by the transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach. Nevertheless, each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages. Under these circumstances, we developed a transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (TU-LESS) extraperitoneal approach for lymphadenectomy. In this research, the primary goal is to demonstrate the feasibility of the novel approach in systematic lymphadenectomy and present the surgical process step-by-step.MethodsBetween May 2020 and June 2021, patients who had the indications of systematic lymphadenectomy underwent lymphadenectomy via the TU-LESS extraperitoneal approach. This new approach was described in detail, and the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes were collected and analyzed.ResultsEight patients with gynecological carcinoma were included in the research, including four with high-risk endometrial cancer and four with early-stage ovarian cancer. The TU-LESS extraperitoneal approach for pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was successfully performed in all patients without conversion. In all, a median of 26.5 pelvic lymph nodes (range 18–35) and 18.0 para-aortic lymph nodes (range 7–43) were retrieved. There was a median of 166.5 min of surgical time (range 123–205). Patients had speedy recoveries without complications. All patients had positive pain responses after surgery, as well as satisfactory cosmetic and body image outcomes.ConclusionOur initial experience showed that it is feasible to perform systematic lymphadenectomy with the TU-LESS extraperitoneal approach. And this new approach may provide a new measure or a beneficial supplement for lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer.

A Single-Port, Multiple-Access, Custom-Made Device Used in Laparoscopically Assisted Cryptorchidectomy in Standing Horses—A Preliminary Study

“…The flexibility of the device at times also made it difficult to place it to access the abdominal cavity, influencing the total surgery time since, when the flexible portion broke, it was necessary to assemble a new device and restart its placement through the minilaparotomy. In this case, it is suggested that the flexible portion of the new device be produced with a more consistent, resistant, versatile, durable, and low-cost material, such as synthetic or semi-synthetic plastic, or even with a material produced by latex [21,22].…”

Ureter Injury in Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer by the Transperitoneal Approach

“…Moreover, in the left-sided abdominal approach of EPA ( Figure 2(a) ), lymph node dissection between the aorta and inferior vena cava or on the right side of the inferior vena cava becomes somewhat difficult due to the field of view. Peng et al reported EPA with an umbilical single port, which allows EPA to have a view from the caudal side, similar to TPA [ 9 ]. For TPA, Mizumoto et al reported an approach from the left side of the descending colon called left dome formation, in which the left ovarian vein and left ureter can be followed all the way from the caudal side, ultimately providing a view exactly like that of the left-sided approach of EPA [ 10 ].…”

An advantageous technique for fertility sparing staging surgery of epithelial ovarian cancer with a single umbilical incision

“…Thus we designed an innovative extraperitoneal approach through the same umbilical incision which achieves satisfactory visualization and lymph node retrieval of both pelvic and para-aortic areas 3 4. Also, we found that the approach was particularly suitable for fertility sparing because it can maintain an intact peritoneum and reduce intraperitoneal adhesion, which might contribute to a future pregnancy.…”