2021
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02294-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transverse occipital sulcus and intraparietal sulcus show neural selectivity to object-scene size relationships

Abstract: To optimize visual search, humans attend to objects with the expected size of the sought target relative to its surrounding scene (object-scene scale consistency). We investigate how the human brain responds to variations in object-scene scale consistency. We use functional magnetic resonance imaging and a voxel-wise feature encoding model to estimate tuning to different object/scene properties. We find that regions involved in scene processing (transverse occipital sulcus) and spatial attention (intraparietal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results illustrating the CNN's ability to learn cues/context contrast with previous findings showing that CNNs do not learn contextual relationships in more complex real-world scenes (47). For example, humans use size relationships between objects and the surrounding scene to visual search (47), and human brain responses in scenes and attention-related areas are influenced by such associations (48,49). Many CNN-based object detectors are not sensitive to such object/scene size relationships (47).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…The current results illustrating the CNN's ability to learn cues/context contrast with previous findings showing that CNNs do not learn contextual relationships in more complex real-world scenes (47). For example, humans use size relationships between objects and the surrounding scene to visual search (47), and human brain responses in scenes and attention-related areas are influenced by such associations (48,49). Many CNN-based object detectors are not sensitive to such object/scene size relationships (47).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…The context of an object includes the regularities of the scene in which it is found, the cluster of other objects it is typically found with, and the spatial relationships between all of these components. These contextual relationships have repeatedly been shown to facilitate human cognition and perception (Biederman et al, 1982;Davenport & Potter, 2004;Koehler & Eckstein, 2015;Lauer et al, 2020;Mudrik et al, 2010;Welbourne et al, 2021). For example, faster reaction times and more accurate responses in recognizing an object are found when the object is either primed by a contextual association (e.g., contextually related scene; Palmer, 1975), or when it is embedded in a congruent context compared with an incongruent context (Biederman et al, 1982;Davenport & Potter, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We conclude that disruption of the right IPS in the healthy brain should cause impairment in view normalization for objects shown at incongruent sizes. IPS has been previously associated with the processing of magnitudes such as numerosity, object size, and illusionary size changes [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%