2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10826-016-0372-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Treatment of Anxiety in Autism Spectrum Disorder (TAASD) Study: Rationale, Design and Methods

Abstract: This paper describes the rationale, design, and methods of the Treatment for Anxiety in Autism Spectrum Disorders study, a three-site randomized controlled trial investigating the relative efficacy of a modular CBT protocol for anxiety in ASD (Behavioral Interventions for Anxiety in Children with Autism) versus standard CBT for pediatric anxiety (the Coping Cat program) and a treatment-as-usual control. The trial is distinct in its scope, its direct comparison of active treatments for anxiety in ASD, and its c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exclusion criteria (and rationale) included (a) a diagnosed or suspected intellectual disability (may struggle to understand cognitive-behavioral therapy concepts); (b) a diagnosis of bipolar or schizophrenia spectrum disorder or suicidality in the past 6 months (requires higher level of care than could be provided); (c) receiving concurrent therapy targeting anxiety, social skills, or behavioral interventions and unwilling to cease this treatment during the RCT (may confound experimental treatment); (d) family unwilling or unable to keep child’s medication regimen consistent during the RCT. Although additional, more stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria were assessed at the screening interview (e.g., confirmed clinically significant anxiety and ASD symptoms, specific IQ range) to determine eligibility for the RCT (see Kerns et al, 2016b), these criteria were not required for participants in the present study, who consisted of all those completing the screening interview. For example, though a verbal comprehension IQ greater than 70 was required for entry to the RCT, youth who completed the screening interview were enrolled in the present study as long as parents did not report a diagnosed or suspected intellectual disability during the initial phone screening.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Exclusion criteria (and rationale) included (a) a diagnosed or suspected intellectual disability (may struggle to understand cognitive-behavioral therapy concepts); (b) a diagnosis of bipolar or schizophrenia spectrum disorder or suicidality in the past 6 months (requires higher level of care than could be provided); (c) receiving concurrent therapy targeting anxiety, social skills, or behavioral interventions and unwilling to cease this treatment during the RCT (may confound experimental treatment); (d) family unwilling or unable to keep child’s medication regimen consistent during the RCT. Although additional, more stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria were assessed at the screening interview (e.g., confirmed clinically significant anxiety and ASD symptoms, specific IQ range) to determine eligibility for the RCT (see Kerns et al, 2016b), these criteria were not required for participants in the present study, who consisted of all those completing the screening interview. For example, though a verbal comprehension IQ greater than 70 was required for entry to the RCT, youth who completed the screening interview were enrolled in the present study as long as parents did not report a diagnosed or suspected intellectual disability during the initial phone screening.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the ADIS-C/P in children with ASD suggest that parent and child agreement about anxiety diagnoses is limited and that clinicians most often base their diagnostic impressions on parent report (Storch, Ehrenreich-May, et al, 2012b). As such, several studies utilizing the ADIS-C/P with ASD populations have relied solely on the parent-report tool (Kernd et al, 2016b; Reaven et al, 2012). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A 5-item total score of 11.5 or greater on the PARS suggests significant risk for anxiety disorder. The PARS has demonstrated inter-rater reliability (.86), high test–retest reliability (.83), and convergent validity in anxious youth with ASD [128, 129] and has shown sensitivity to treatment effects in clinical trials of anxiety interventions for children with ASD [130, 131]. For this study, the PARS was administered by C.K.…”
Section: Children's Sleep Habits Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Augmenting traditional CBT strategies with social skills training and parent management techniques have also been used to address broader deficits that potentially contribute to and/or exacerbate anxiety [69]. Research in treating adults with anxiety and ASD is more preliminary, but also suggests that CBT approaches and mindfulness techniques may be promising [70••, 71]. Behavioral treatment for individuals with OCD and ASD has received much less attention in the literature, but existing research suggests that obsessive-compulsive symptoms can improve with CBT [72].…”
Section: Current Approaches To Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%