1981
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(81)90118-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The treatment of singularities in the calculation of stress intensity factors using the boundary integral equation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To take into account the form of the singularity more e ectively and achieve better accuracy and faster convergence, special methods are often required which incorporate the form of the singularity in the numerical scheme, which is, in general, more e ective than mesh reÿnement (see References [2][3][4] and references therein). We should also add here the early works of Symm [5] Papamichael and Symm [6] and Xanthis et al [7] who developed singular boundary integral methods. Two notable alternatives to singular methods are the hp version of the ÿnite element method with geometrically graded meshes [8; 9], and a recently proposed multigrid ÿnite element method on quasi-uniform meshes [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To take into account the form of the singularity more e ectively and achieve better accuracy and faster convergence, special methods are often required which incorporate the form of the singularity in the numerical scheme, which is, in general, more e ective than mesh reÿnement (see References [2][3][4] and references therein). We should also add here the early works of Symm [5] Papamichael and Symm [6] and Xanthis et al [7] who developed singular boundary integral methods. Two notable alternatives to singular methods are the hp version of the ÿnite element method with geometrically graded meshes [8; 9], and a recently proposed multigrid ÿnite element method on quasi-uniform meshes [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Engng, 14, 289±304 (1998) without calculating the other coecients in the polynomial approximation (13). To compare our enhancement procedure to one of those existing in the literature, namely Aitken's d 2 technique used successfully in the SIF determination by Sinclair et al 24 or Xanthis et al, 22 we summarize it in the present Section. Aitken's d 2 technique consists in assuming that the SIF in mode J is related to grid size h by the following expression: where c and a are arbitrary constants and J belongs to {I, II, III}.…”
Section: Stress Intensity Factors Determination By Richardson's Extramentioning
confidence: 97%
“…18 Our technique derives from the new approach, using the PII, studied in References 19 and 20. For antiplane problems, we use one of the PII introduced by Eshelby and Knowles 21,22 and for plane problems we base our technique on that exhibited by Stern et al in Reference 13 to distinguish contributions due to crack opening and those due to shear in the mixed mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 2 we compare the results computed by using formula (34) with results obtained by several other methods [18,27,37].…”
Section: The Motz' Anti-plane Crack Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%