The trend in mental health-related mortality rates in Australia 1916-2004: implications for policy

Abstract

BackgroundThis study determines the trend in mental health-related mortality (defined here as the aggregation of suicide and deaths coded as "mental/behavioural disorders"), and its relative numerical importance, and to argue that this has importance to policy-makers. Its results will have policy relevance because policy-makers have been predominantly concerned with cost-containment, but a re-appraisal of this issue is occurring, and the trade-off between health expenditures and valuable gains in longevity is being emphasised now. This study examines longevity gains from mental health-related interventions, or their absence, at the population level. The study sums mortality data for suicide and mental/behavioural disorders across the relevant ICD codes through time in Australia for the period 1916-2004. There are two measures applied to the mortality rates: the conventional age-standardised headcount; and the age-standardised Potential Years of Life Lost (PYLL), a measure of premature mortality. Mortality rates formed from these data are analysed via comparisons with mortality rates for All Causes, and with circulatory diseases, cancer and motor vehicle accidents, measured by both methods.ResultsThis study finds the temporal trend in mental health-related mortality rates (which reflects the longevity of people with mental illness) has worsened through time. There are no gains. This trend contrasts with the (known) gains in longevity from All Causes, and the gains from decreases achieved in previously rising mortality rates from circulatory diseases and motor vehicle accidents. Also, PYLL calculation shows mental health-related mortality is a proportionately greater cause of death compared with applying headcount metrics.ConclusionsThere are several factors that could reverse this trend. First, improved access to interventions or therapies for mental disorders could decrease the mortality analysed here. Second, it is important also that new efficacious therapies for various mental disorders be developed. Furthermore, it is also important that suicide prevention strategies be implemented, particularly for at-risk groups. To bring the mental health sector into parity with many other parts of the health system will require knowledge of the causative factors that underlie mental disorders, which can, in turn, lead to efficacious therapies. As in any case of a knowledge deficit, what is needed are resources to address that knowledge gap. Conceiving the problem in this way, ie as a knowledge gap, indicates the crucial role of research and development activity. This term implies a concern, not simply with basic research, but also with applied research. It is commonplace in other sectors of the economy to emphasise the trichotomy of invention, innovation and diffusion of new products and processes. This three-fold conception is also relevant to addressing the knowledge gap in the mental health sector.

The treatment of schizophrenia: Can we raise the standard of care?

“…Other metrics used to compare outcomes across disease areas, which capture both fatal and non-fatal health losses, are quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or disability-adjusted life years (DALYs); however, rarely are sets of time series data on these indices collected: certainly they do not exist for mental disorders (Doessel et al, 2010). Despite the partial nature of MR as a health outcome measure, it has been informatively applied to mental disorders, where there is a clear trend for mental disorder-related MR to be increasing in Australia over time (Doessel et al, 2010), this trend being particularly marked for people with schizophrenia (Saha et al, 2007). Meta-analysis of MRs of people with schizophrenia show that in the 1970s standardised MRs were increased 1.84-fold over those of the general population, in the 1980s they were increased 2.98-fold and Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry,50(12) in the 1990s they were increased 3.20-fold (Saha et al, 2007).…”

“…The standard index of progress being made in a disease field at a population level is mortality rate (MR) – greater treatment effectiveness indicated by reductions in the MR of patients over time. Other metrics used to compare outcomes across disease areas, which capture both fatal and non-fatal health losses, are quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or disability-adjusted life years (DALYs); however, rarely are sets of time series data on these indices collected: certainly they do not exist for mental disorders (Doessel et al, 2010). Despite the partial nature of MR as a health outcome measure, it has been informatively applied to mental disorders, where there is a clear trend for mental disorder–related MR to be increasing in Australia over time (Doessel et al, 2010), this trend being particularly marked for people with schizophrenia (Saha et al, 2007).…”

Preventing mental illness: closing the evidence-practice gap through workforce and services planning

“…Despite advances in treatment options, increasing rates of treatment, and increased expenditure on mental health services [ 54 , 55 ], the prevalence of mental illness and its impact on mortality has not improved in Australia over the last 20 years [ 56 , 57 ]. This reflects a combination of limited effectiveness of treatments and only partial access to and uptake of treatment.…”

Resource Misallocation in Australia’s Mental Health Sector under Medicare: Evidence from Time-series Data*

“…Despite the difficulties of empirical work on this phenomenon, neglecting it is untenable. The secular trend in mental health-related mortality rates has worsened since 1916 (Doessel et al, 2010b). The results of that study relate directly to the absence of productivity gains overall in the treatment of serious mental illness.…”

“…Despite the difficulties of empirical work on this phenomenon, neglecting it is untenable. The secular trend in mental health‐related mortality rates has worsened since 1916 (Doessel et al. , 2010b).…”