2010
DOI: 10.1144/sp334.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Triassic timescale: an introduction

Abstract: German geologists began

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is already given, but not explicitly stated, by Krystyn et al (2009), Lucas (2010 and Balini et al (2010).…”
Section: First Record Of Rhabdoceras Suessi (Ammonoidea) From the Tramentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This is already given, but not explicitly stated, by Krystyn et al (2009), Lucas (2010 and Balini et al (2010).…”
Section: First Record Of Rhabdoceras Suessi (Ammonoidea) From the Tramentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The composition of these Late Triassic assemblages varies, and is often poorly known in part due to a lack of quantitative data. Another complicating factor regarding their evolution includes the fact that the Late Triassic spans ~36 myr (Lucas, 2010;Gradstein et al, 2012, Ogg et al 2016, and the stratigraphical resolution is relatively poor, with a lack of macrofossil data and geochronological dating in many areas. Determining exact stratigraphical occurrences and establishing correlations are therefore difficult, and age assignments of the dinoflagellate cyst records have, as a result, varying levels of uncertainty.…”
Section: Triassic Dinoflagellate Cysts State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of the composition of the various Late Triassic assemblages varies due to a lack of quantitative data, and is therefore in part poorly known. Another complicating factor regarding their evolution includes the fact that the Late Triassic spans ~36 my (Lucas, 2010;Gradstein et al, 2012, Ogg et al 2016 and the stratigraphical resolution is relatively poor, with a lack of macrofossil data and geochronological dating in most areas. In addition, many relevant publications are relatively old and have applied chrono-and lithostratigraphical nomenclature, which now is outdated, thereby hampering reliable age assignments and correlation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= questionable late Anisian, lL‐C = late Ladinian to Carnian, C = Carnian, N = Norian; arrows symbolizing supposed spreading of the Isocrinidae from the far‐eastern part of the Palaeotethys ocean (maybe today’s south‐west China) to various other regions; Anisian palaeogeographical reconstruction modified from Blakey (2010). B, stratigraphical chart with ranges of Isocrinidae in the different regions; reliable ranges in black, stratigraphically questionable occurrences in white to grey; radioisotopic ages after Lucas (2010) and Mundil et al. (2010), supplemented by Subcommission for Stratigraphic Information (2009).…”
Section: Origin and Early Evolution Of The Isocrinidamentioning
confidence: 99%