2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-009-9513-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Tribological Properties of a Nano-Eutectic Fe1.87C0.13 Alloy Under Liquid Paraffine Lubrication

Abstract: The tribological properties of the nano-eutectic Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy are investigated under liquid paraffine lubrication against AISI52100 steel ball at room temperature with varied applied load and sliding speed. As comparison, the annealed coarse-grained Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy is also examined in the same testing condition. The wear rate of the two alloys increases with increasing applied load and sliding speed. The wear resistance of the nano-eutectic Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy is about 2-20 times higher than that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the wear mechanism of the nanoeutectic Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy is transformed from plowing and corrosion wear to fatigue crack with increasing applied load, whereas that of the annealed coarse-grained Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy is transformed from plowing and corrosion wear to fatigue flaking. The wear resistance of the nano-eutectic Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy was lower than that of the annealed coarse-grained Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy for low applied load under the water environment, in contrast to the results for the same alloy under oil-lubricated conditions [14]. The Vickers microhardness of the two alloys (3.8 and 2.2 GPa, respectively, for the nano-eutectic and annealed Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloys) is obviously lower than that of the AISI52100 steel ball (8.3 GPa), and the surfaces of both Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloys contact with matching asperities on the AISI52100 steel ball, leading to plowing wear.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the wear mechanism of the nanoeutectic Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy is transformed from plowing and corrosion wear to fatigue crack with increasing applied load, whereas that of the annealed coarse-grained Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy is transformed from plowing and corrosion wear to fatigue flaking. The wear resistance of the nano-eutectic Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy was lower than that of the annealed coarse-grained Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy for low applied load under the water environment, in contrast to the results for the same alloy under oil-lubricated conditions [14]. The Vickers microhardness of the two alloys (3.8 and 2.2 GPa, respectively, for the nano-eutectic and annealed Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloys) is obviously lower than that of the AISI52100 steel ball (8.3 GPa), and the surfaces of both Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloys contact with matching asperities on the AISI52100 steel ball, leading to plowing wear.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The fresh frictional surfaces of the nano-eutectic Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy have higher reactive activity than those of the annealed coarse-grained Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy [14]. In addition, higher sliding speed and applied load can increase the tribochemical reaction rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Because the large volume fraction of grain boundaries could block the dislocation movement, 3 the strength and hardness of the nanostructured metals improves significantly, which is beneficial to the enhancement of their wear resistance. Wang et al 4 reported that due to the hardness improvement, the wear resistance of nano-eutectic Fe 1.87 C 0.13 alloy is about 2-6 times higher than that of the annealed coarse-grained counterpart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%