“…Dioxophosphoranes are usually stabilized within a larger molecular framework and are, in some instances, deliberately released for detection/identification as well as further reactivity studies such as in the case of compounds 4 through 7 (Figure ). In fact, owing to the exceptional electrophilic characteristic of the three-coordinate phosphorus atom, the identity of dioxophosphoranes was normally established by either low-temperature matrix isolation procedures, − , high-temperature gas-phase analysis, intramolecular C–H/C–F bond activations, , or trapping experiments, that is, reactivity studies in the presence of, for example, alcohols, amines, or epoxides . The reactivity of transient dioxophosphoranes with different molecules actually represents a very useful approach for the phosphorylation/phosphonylation of organic molecules potentially yielding compounds, including the biologically important ones, that would be difficult to obtain by other synthetic methods. − For example, fragmentation of compounds that resemble 4 (Figure ) represents arguably the most versatile/valuable approach in generating synthetically usable RO 2 P fragments. ,, On the other hand, base-stabilized compounds such as 9 and 10 ( 8 is in fact produced by the photolysis of 4 at −75 °C in THF), including transition metal-stabilized RPO 2 complexes, are generally not reported to act as a source of the RO 2 P fragment that could be used for further reactivity studies. ,,− A similar conclusion could be reached for neutral but zwitterionic ( 11 , Figure ) − and anionic ( 12 ) − compounds (i.e., the O-deprotonated form of the monobasic tautomer of phosphonous acid) because they could be viewed as parent dioxophosphorane-containing species.…”