The Tropical Ecology, Assessment and Monitoring (TEAM) Network: An early warning system for tropical rain forests

Abstract

While there are well established early warning systems for a number of natural phenomena (e.g. earthquakes, catastrophic fires, tsunamis), we do not have an early warning system for biodiversity. Yet, we are losing species at an unprecedented rate, and this especially occurs in tropical rainforests, the biologically richest but most eroded biome on earth. Unfortunately, there is a chronic gap in standardized and pan-tropical data in tropical forests, affecting our capacity to monitor changes and anticipate future scenarios. The Tropical Ecology, Assessment and Monitoring (TEAM) Network was established to contribute addressing this issue, as it generates real time data to monitor long-term trends in tropical biodiversity and guide conservation practice. We present the Network and focus primarily on the Terrestrial Vertebrates protocol, that uses systematic camera trapping to detect forest mammals and birds, and secondarily on the Zone of Interaction protocol, that measures changes in the anthroposphere around the core monitoring area. With over 3 million images so far recorded, and managed using advanced information technology, TEAM has created the most important data set on tropical forest mammals globally. We provide examples of site-specific and global analyses that, combined with data on anthropogenic disturbance collected in the larger ecosystem where monitoring sites are, allowed us to understand the drivers of changes of target species and communities in space and time. We discuss the potential of this system as a candidate model towards setting up an early warning system that can effectively anticipate changes in coupled human-natural system, trigger management actions, and hence decrease the gap between research and management responses. In turn, TEAM produces robust biodiversity indicators that meet the requirements set by global policies such as the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Standardization in data collection and public sharing of data in near real time are essential features of such system.

Big data and disaster management: a systematic review and agenda for future research

“…These studies focus on how to solve problems in relation to post-earthquake emergency response (Ghosh and Gosavi, 2017), early warning system for biodiversity (Rovero and Ahumada, 2017), welfare impacts of urban disasters (Grinberger and Felsenstein, 2016), etc. This includes the use of semi-Markov model, cloud-based architecture, agent-based models, and P2P cloud network services (Chung and Park, 2016).…”

Integrating data from different survey types for population monitoring of an endangered species: the case of the Eld’s deer

“…Questions about the abundances and trends of species’ populations are ideally resolved using large-scale, well-designed monitoring programs 16 . However, large-scale monitoring schemes have only been achieved for certain taxa (e.g., birds 17 ) or have specific methods (e.g., camera traps 18 ) designed for specific objectives. Even when local monitoring programs are well-designed for their survey area, they can be difficult to extrapolate to make larger-scale inferences, or apply to questions other than those originally intended 19 .…”

Innovations in Camera Trapping Technology and Approaches: The Integration of Citizen Science and Artificial Intelligence

“…Camera traps have also been increasingly employed as part of long-term, wide-scale monitoring programs [46]. This has led to some programs managing millions of images, including the Snapshot Serengeti project [7], the dataset collated by the Tropical Ecology Assessment and Monitoring Team (TEAM, now part of the 'Wildlife Insights' project, https://www.wildlifeinsights.org/) [47] and that collected by Dorji et al in Bhutan [48]. While some projects monitor communities of species, many other surveys target a single species or taxon.…”