2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2009.00416.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tropospheric cycle of H<sub>2</sub>: a critical review

Abstract: A B S T R A C TThe literature on the distribution, budget and isotope content of molecular hydrogen (H 2 ) in the troposphere is critically reviewed. The global distribution of H 2 is reasonably well established and is relatively uniform. The surface measurements exhibit a weak latitudinal gradient with 3% higher concentrations in the Southern Hemisphere and seasonal variations that maximize in arctic latitudes and the interior of continents with peak-to-peak amplitudes up to 10%. There is no evidence for a co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
146
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
(516 reference statements)
11
146
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Storage fluxes of H 2 were calculated, but were typically small (<| 1 nmol m −2 s −1 |), and were therefore not included in the comparison. The midday summertime H 2 uptake rates correspond to H 2 deposition velocities of 0.04 to 0.10 cm s −1 , which were within the range of previously reported soil H 2 deposition velocities, so our results support the previously reported values that typically range between 0.01 and 0.10 cm s −1 (Ehhalt and Rohrer, 2009).…”
Section: Flux-gradient Methods Application: H 2 Gradient Fluxessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Storage fluxes of H 2 were calculated, but were typically small (<| 1 nmol m −2 s −1 |), and were therefore not included in the comparison. The midday summertime H 2 uptake rates correspond to H 2 deposition velocities of 0.04 to 0.10 cm s −1 , which were within the range of previously reported soil H 2 deposition velocities, so our results support the previously reported values that typically range between 0.01 and 0.10 cm s −1 (Ehhalt and Rohrer, 2009).…”
Section: Flux-gradient Methods Application: H 2 Gradient Fluxessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The major sources and sinks are nearly balanced so atmospheric H 2 concentrations are stable. Although the global atmospheric H 2 budget has been derived through a variety of methods, it remains poorly constrained at the regional level and disputed at the global level, and a process-based understanding is lacking (as reviewed by Ehhalt and Rohrer, 2009). Therefore, there are large uncertainties in the estimated impact of changes to the H 2 biogeochemical cycle that might arise from changes in energy use, land use, and climate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current production (76 Tg yr À1 ) and loss rates (79 Tg yr À1 ) yield a tropospheric H 2 lifetime of 2 years. 44,45 Today about 50% of the total tropospheric H 2 production can be considered anthropogenic. 44 The average vertical distribution of H 2 in the lower and middle stratosphere proves to be relatively uniform as in the troposphere.…”
Section: Tropospheric Hydrogen Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction of H 2 with OH and soil uptake are the major sinks of H 2 in the troposphere. The strength of each term is given in the literature [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] and compiled in Ehhalt and Rohrer 44 (2009). The current production (76 Tg yr À1 ) and loss rates (79 Tg yr À1 ) yield a tropospheric H 2 lifetime of 2 years.…”
Section: Tropospheric Hydrogen Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atmospheric carbon monoxide (CO) plays an important role in tropospheric chemistry (Logan et al, 1981), and acts as a useful tracer for emissions of CO 2 , CH 4 , and H 2 from biomass and fossil fuel burning (Andreae and Merlet, 2001;Levin and Karstens, 2007;Ehhalt and Rohrer, 2009;Turnbull et al, 2009). A considerable number of techniques have been employed to perform atmospheric measurements of CO, such as nondispersive infrared spectroscopy (NDIR) (Dickerson and Delany, 1988), vacuum ultraviolet resonance fluorescence (VURF) (Gerbig et al, 1999), tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) (Sachse et al, 1987), closed path Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) absorption (Griffith et al, 2012), gas chromatography combined with a mercuric oxide detector or a flame ionization detector (GC/HgO or GC/FID) (Novelli, 1999) and, more recently, quantum cascade laser (QCL) (McManus et al, 2008), integrated cavity output spectroscopy (ICOS) (O'Keefe, 1998), and cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) (Crosson, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%