2018
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e15553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The trough levels of bevacizumab significantly affect the outcome of the treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A Turkish Oncology Group study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total plasma or serum VEGF concentration is used as an in vivo marker, and to date, its true association with the efficacy of bevacizumab for treating cancer in humans is uncertain, as the results of studies assessing the predictive value of serum VEGF levels for treatment outcomes have been not consistent ( Presta et al, 1997 ; Bernaards et al, 2010 ; Tang et al, 2016 ). Aiming to find biomarkers, several studies have investigated the exposure–response relationship of bevacizumab, exploring trough concentrations associated with a threshold for treatment efficacy ( Nugue et al, 2013 ; Caulet et al, 2016 ; Akbulut et al, 2018 ; Papachristos et al, 2020 ), and most of the research has focused on metastatic colorectal cancer, with little to no published data from investigations of bevacizumab’s exposure–response relationship in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total plasma or serum VEGF concentration is used as an in vivo marker, and to date, its true association with the efficacy of bevacizumab for treating cancer in humans is uncertain, as the results of studies assessing the predictive value of serum VEGF levels for treatment outcomes have been not consistent ( Presta et al, 1997 ; Bernaards et al, 2010 ; Tang et al, 2016 ). Aiming to find biomarkers, several studies have investigated the exposure–response relationship of bevacizumab, exploring trough concentrations associated with a threshold for treatment efficacy ( Nugue et al, 2013 ; Caulet et al, 2016 ; Akbulut et al, 2018 ; Papachristos et al, 2020 ), and most of the research has focused on metastatic colorectal cancer, with little to no published data from investigations of bevacizumab’s exposure–response relationship in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a positive exposure-response relationship suggests that longer overall (OS) and/or progression-free (PFS) survivals are associated with higher exposure, as identified for the bevacizumab in several studies. [3][4][5][6] However, recent studies have shown that the actual relationship is more complex, [7][8][9] which might challenge the usual strategies of description and interpretation of exposure-response analysis for mAbs in oncology. 2 The mAb exposure-response relationship may be confounded by various factors, 1,10,11 notably baseline disease status 3 and time-varying phenomena such as target engagement 12 and disease improvement 13 (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, it is assumed that the exposure‐response relationship is a one‐way connection wherein clinical response is driven by exposure. Therefore, a positive exposure‐response relationship suggests that longer overall (OS) and/or progression‐free (PFS) survivals are associated with higher exposure, as identified for the bevacizumab in several studies 3–6 . However, recent studies have shown that the actual relationship is more complex, 7–9 which might challenge the usual strategies of description and interpretation of exposure‐response analysis for mAbs in oncology 2 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%