2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2012.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The truncated Stieltjes moment problem solved by using kernel density functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[32], the high flexibility of neural networks allows for the straightforward inclusion of additional constraints, such as the kinematic distributions of B → X u ν which will be measured with good accuracy at the upcoming Belle-II experiment [33]. The measurement of the M X or E shapes, for instance, will contribute useful information on the SFs and in turn reduce the SF uncertainty in the |V ub | extraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32], the high flexibility of neural networks allows for the straightforward inclusion of additional constraints, such as the kinematic distributions of B → X u ν which will be measured with good accuracy at the upcoming Belle-II experiment [33]. The measurement of the M X or E shapes, for instance, will contribute useful information on the SFs and in turn reduce the SF uncertainty in the |V ub | extraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither of these attempts performed as well as the do-validated bandwidth. It would be interesting to see whether indirect cross-validation and do-validation would also be useful to improve other variants of the kernel density estimation problem, such as the problem considered by Gavriliadis and Athanassoulis (2012), Park (2013), Eidous (2012) or Martínez-Miranda et al (2013).…”
Section: Simulation Experiments About Indirect Do-validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, first of all note that from (1) and (2) we have (5) where G(u) = F(−log b u) and ν = b −x . On the other hand, taking the derivative of with respect to u we obtain (6) with c = [αν] + 1 and d = α − [αν]. Hence, applying the integration by parts in the last integral of (5) and taking into account (6), where ν = b −x , we derive: Therefore, (7) where Ḡ(u) = 1 − G(u) = S(−log b u) and Ḡ(ν) = S(x).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we suggest the modified, scaled version of the MR-Laplace transform inversion that enables us to apply it in the case of the Stieltjes moment problem as well, i.e., when T = ∞. The reader is referred to [3][4][5][6], where the questions on the momentdeterminacy of probability distributions and their approximations in the framework of inverse moment problem are investigated. See also Tagliani and Velasquez [7], where the fractional moments are used to approximate the Laplace transform inversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%