The Tuning of Human Motor Response to Risk in a Dynamic Environment Task

Abstract

The role of motor uncertainty in discrete or static space tasks, such as pointing tasks, has been investigated in many experiments. These studies have shown that humans hold an internal representation of intrinsic and extrinsic motor uncertainty and compensate for this variability when planning movement. The aim of this study was to investigate how humans respond to uncertainties during movement execution in a dynamic environment despite indeterminate knowledge of the outcome of actions. Additionally, the role of errors, or lack thereof, in predicting risk was examined. In the experiment, subjects completed a driving simulation game on a two-lane road. The road contained random curves so that subjects were forced to use sensory feedback to complete the task and could not rely only on motor planning. Risk was manipulated by using horizontal perturbations to create the illusion of driving on a bumpy road, thereby imposing motor uncertainty, and altering the cost function of the road. Results suggest continual responsiveness to cost and uncertainty in a dynamic task and provide evidence that subjects avoid risk even in the absence of errors. The results suggest that humans tune their statistical motor behavior based on cost, taking into account probabilities of possible outcomes in response to environmental uncertainty.

Perceived Cost and Intrinsic Motor Variability Modulate the Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off

“…We define the term “risk” to be the expected cost of behavior. Risk is thus the product of the probability of error and the cost of error [ 1 – 2 ]. A low cost but high probability of error is not risky, likewise, a high cost but low probability of error is not risky.…”

Brains and Sprains: The Brain's Role in Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

“…7 Errors in judgment or unanticipated stimuli may cause a momentary loss of situational awareness or startle responses. 8,10,11 In this article, I briefly review anecdotal, theoretical, and clinical research evidence for the brain's role in maintaining joint stability and neuropsychological factors that may render individuals injury prone. The subsequent loss of neuromuscular control and inability to optimally regulate knee-joint stiffness diminishes dynamic stability.…”

On neuromechanical approaches for the study of biological and robotic grasp and manipulation

“…Bayesian inference [186,187] or stochastic control [143] are formal approaches to describe the emergence of probability density functions of the mapping from perception/intention to action in the presence of unavoidable uncertainty, noise, risk and variability in the real world. Moreover, there are probabilistic approaches that can be used with populations of spiking neurons to produce physical behavior in a cost-agnostic, emergent, model-free way [188,189,75,76].…”