2003
DOI: 10.1108/01437720310479714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The turnover of jobs and workers in a deep recession: evidence from the Finnish business sector

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average weekly working time is around 30 hours. A significant fraction of the workers in the retail trade sector are students, which partly explains high turnover rates (Ilmakunnas and Maliranta 2003). Unfortunately, the data do not contain any indicators that would allow calculating their exact share.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average weekly working time is around 30 hours. A significant fraction of the workers in the retail trade sector are students, which partly explains high turnover rates (Ilmakunnas and Maliranta 2003). Unfortunately, the data do not contain any indicators that would allow calculating their exact share.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Ilmakunnas and Maliranta (2003) document that plant-level worker turnover is strongly procyclical in Finland.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ilmakunnas and Maliranta (2003) report that the separation rate in the Finnish business sector varied between 17 and 28 per cent in the 1990s. These figures underestimate actual turnover, since they are based on comparisons of end-ofthe-year situations at the plant level.…”
Section: The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%