2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2003.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘Two finger’ sign. Clinical examination of palmaris longus (PL) tendon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although alternative methods of examination of this tendon have been described (Thompson et al, 1921;Mishra;Pushpakumar et al), they offer no definitive advantage over the conventional method (Oudit et al, 2005). The conventional method was therefore preferred because it is fairly easy and reproducible, when used for a large number of subjects as in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although alternative methods of examination of this tendon have been described (Thompson et al, 1921;Mishra;Pushpakumar et al), they offer no definitive advantage over the conventional method (Oudit et al, 2005). The conventional method was therefore preferred because it is fairly easy and reproducible, when used for a large number of subjects as in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pushpakumar's "two-finger sign" method (Pushpakumar et al, 2004). The subject was asked to fully extend the index finger and middle finger, the wrist and other fingers are flexed and finally the thumb is fully opposed and flexed (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine different techniques have been put forward to manually test for the presence of the PLM and most claimed to have an advantage over other techniques (Schaeffer, 1909;Zeybek et al, 1998;Mishra, 2001;Pushpakumar et al, 2004;Bhattacharya and Raveendra Reddy, 2005;Mahajan, 2005;Oudit et al, 2005). The rationale for testing the PLM clinically can be best understood by examining the actions of this muscle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Subjects who are having any deformities, diseases or injury in the upper extremity were excluded. In this study, the presence or absence of PL was determined by series of tendon examination techniques described by Schaeffer's test (standard test) (Schaeffer, 1909), Thompson's fist (Thompson et al, 1921), Mishra's 1st and 2nd test (Mishra, 2001) and Pushpakumar's two finger sign (Pushpakumar et al, 2004). Each subject was initially asked to do the standard test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%