2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/750/1/13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Two States of Star-Forming Clouds

Abstract: We examine the effects of self-gravity and magnetic fields on supersonic turbulence in isothermal molecular clouds with high resolution simulations and adaptive mesh refinement. These simulations use large root grids (512 3 ) to capture turbulence and four levels of refinement to capture high density, for an effective resolution of 8, 196 3 . Three Mach 9 simulations are performed, two super-Alfvénic and one trans-Alfvénic. We find that gravity splits the clouds into two populations, one low density turbulent … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
248
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(285 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
36
248
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation is confirmed by restricting the plot to prestellar cores only, as indicated by the dotted line in the figure. Such behaviour is predicted by simulations (Kritsuk et al 2011;Collins et al 2012;Federrath & Klessen 2013) which yield model PDFs similar in appearance to Fig. 8.…”
Section: Relationship To Unbound Starless Coressupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This interpretation is confirmed by restricting the plot to prestellar cores only, as indicated by the dotted line in the figure. Such behaviour is predicted by simulations (Kritsuk et al 2011;Collins et al 2012;Federrath & Klessen 2013) which yield model PDFs similar in appearance to Fig. 8.…”
Section: Relationship To Unbound Starless Coressupporting
confidence: 74%
“…number of dense regions increases and this introduces a powerlaw tail on the high-density side of the PDF (e.g., Klessen 2000;Vázquez-Semadeni et al 2008;Collins et al 2012;Girichidis et al 2014). These predictions are observationally verified for giant molecular clouds (GMCs) in the Milky Way (e.g., Lombardi et al 2010;Schneider et al 2012).…”
Section: Surface Stellar Mass Density Distributionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Our simulations do not show the emergence of a clear power-law tail in the PDF as star formation progresses (cf. Klessen et al 2000;Vázquez-Semadeni et al 2008;Federrath et al 2008;Kritsuk et al 2011;Collins et al 2012;Federrath & Klessen 2013;Lee et al 2015), likely because our global cloud models lack resolution at the highest densities. The measured values of σ lnΣ are somewhat larger in our simulations than in nearby well-studied clouds (Schneider et al 2015), although more massive, more turbulent GMCs are likely to have broader PDFs.…”
Section: Surface Density Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%