1988
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100104542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tympanic membrane in cross section: a finite element analysis

Abstract: This paper applies the technique of finite element analysis to the tympanic membrane. A Two-dimensional cross-sectional model of the tympanic membrane and malleus is described. A variety of experiments have been performed on this model, and displacements under a uniform load are analysed. The shape of the displaced membrane and the movement of the umbo were found tobe sensitive to a number of factors. These include the elastic modulus of the membrane, the presence and position of the axis or rotation of the ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The middle value is approximately one third of our baseline value of the pars-tensa Young's modulus, a pars-flaccida/pars-tensa stiffness ratio that has been used in other modelling studies (e.g. Lesser and Williams 1988;Koike et al 2002).…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The middle value is approximately one third of our baseline value of the pars-tensa Young's modulus, a pars-flaccida/pars-tensa stiffness ratio that has been used in other modelling studies (e.g. Lesser and Williams 1988;Koike et al 2002).…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The very high value of 20 GPa reported in Table 3 of Volandri et al (2011) was a typographical error (GPa rather than MPa) in the original paper by Gentil et al (2005) (personal communication with Gentil). The very low value of 1.5 MPa used by Lesser and Williams (1988) was for a 2-D model. The very low values used by Funnell and Laszlo (1978) and Funnell (2001) for Ec were intended to be extreme examples of anisotropy, not realistic estimates.…”
Section: Baseline Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model used spring and damping to represent TM impedance effect by the floor of stapes and cochlea. Lesser et al [8,9] used FE method to study the mechanical properties of human by setting up a FE model of 2-D cross section on TM and the malleus to analyze the static displacement of those two. Subsequently, Williams et al [10,11] changed variable parameters of TM in FE model to study middle ear model characteristics under external forces in a fixed frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%