2014
DOI: 10.1177/1541931214581373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The typing performance and preference costs of reducing tactile feedback and tactile landmarks in tablet keyboards

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of tactile landmarks and tactile feedback on keyboard typing under real-world conditions. Four keyboards were tested, representing a range of tactile landmarks versus no landmarks, tactile feedback versus no tactile feedback, and the ability to rest the fingers on the keys vs. keys that triggered when simply touched. Participants completed a typing task on each of the keyboards while their performance and preference was collected. The conventional keyboard … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We simulated presses with four common button types (linear, tactile, touch, mid-air). We report simulation results for (1) displacement-velocity patterns, (2) temporal precision and success rate in button activation, and (3) use of force, comparing with effects reported in empirical studies [7,36,42,46,48,53,54,59,66,69]. Over the simulations, we find evidence for the plausibility of the optimality assumption.…”
Section: Probabilistic Internal Modelmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We simulated presses with four common button types (linear, tactile, touch, mid-air). We report simulation results for (1) displacement-velocity patterns, (2) temporal precision and success rate in button activation, and (3) use of force, comparing with effects reported in empirical studies [7,36,42,46,48,53,54,59,66,69]. Over the simulations, we find evidence for the plausibility of the optimality assumption.…”
Section: Probabilistic Internal Modelmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…That touch buttons are inferior in tasks requiring temporal movement control is in line also with other findings. For example, touch buttons have been found to be inferior in typing [14,53]. In NEUROMECHANIC, these differences are partially due to higher variation in the finger starting height: the possibility of keeping the finger on top of the physical button eliminates one source of timing uncertainty.…”
Section: Results: Success Rate and Temporal Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation