2019
DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2019.01.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Typology Of Modern Students’ Family Self-Determination

Abstract: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to determine the types of family self-determination, we used the previously presented algorithm (Merzlyakova, 2018b), which involves the first stage of factorial analysis by the principal components method, suitability analysis, and then the cluster analysis by the method k-means. In the group of college students there is the following distribution: diffuse family self-determination -48.6 % (154 people), predetermined family selfdetermination -10.5% (33 people), declared family selfdetermination-23.2% (73 people), achieved and implemented family self-determination-17.7% (56 people).…”
Section: Results Of Diagnostics Of Types Of Family Self-determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine the types of family self-determination, we used the previously presented algorithm (Merzlyakova, 2018b), which involves the first stage of factorial analysis by the principal components method, suitability analysis, and then the cluster analysis by the method k-means. In the group of college students there is the following distribution: diffuse family self-determination -48.6 % (154 people), predetermined family selfdetermination -10.5% (33 people), declared family selfdetermination-23.2% (73 people), achieved and implemented family self-determination-17.7% (56 people).…”
Section: Results Of Diagnostics Of Types Of Family Self-determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through previous studies components of the structure, content characteristics and types of family self-determination of modern boys and girls have been identified (Merzlyakova, 2018(Merzlyakova, , 2019…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typological groups of respondents that differ from each other at the degree of emotional attractiveness and dynamism (value and activity factor), influence (power factor) of marriage and family image at the level of statistical significance, are empirically extracted. The types (predetermined, declared, diffused, realized, and achieved types) and psychological mechanisms of family self-determination of student youth are described and analyzed (Merzlyakova, 2018b). It has been established (Merzlyakova, 2018a(Merzlyakova, , 2019a) that boys and girls' indicators of family self-determination are prescribed by a system of different social-cultural conditions (residence, religion, ethnocultural background, type of a parental family structure, level of a family cohesion, children-parents relationships) and individual-psychological factors (cognitive abilities, typological characteristics of temperament, emotional and volitional properties of a personality, communication abilities and peculiarities of interpersonal interaction).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%