The Oxford Handbook of Negation 2020
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Typology of Negation

Abstract:

This chapter discusses a number of central phenomena in the typology of negation, building on state-of-the-art typological research. The focus lies on standard negation, prohibitive negation, existential negation, and the negation of indefinites. Cross-linguistic variation is central in the discussion, and for most phenomena the question is addressed as to what extent a certain pattern is frequent or rare. As far as it is possible, observed patterns are provided with explanations, which are often diachronic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
300
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 241 publications
0
300
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess validation rates of these variants, we utilized the RNA-Seq data to validate WGS variants in protein coding regions of the genome. Reads from samples in each substrain were combined and GATK best practices pipeline for RNA-Seq variant calling 52 was used. Average genome-wide read coverage of RNA-Seq data for fourteen substrains ranged from 1.81x to 3.71x with a median of 3.08x.…”
Section: Star Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess validation rates of these variants, we utilized the RNA-Seq data to validate WGS variants in protein coding regions of the genome. Reads from samples in each substrain were combined and GATK best practices pipeline for RNA-Seq variant calling 52 was used. Average genome-wide read coverage of RNA-Seq data for fourteen substrains ranged from 1.81x to 3.71x with a median of 3.08x.…”
Section: Star Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WGS SNPs and INDELs which intersect with protein coding exon and UTR annotations (from Ensembl) and have at least 3X coverage in RNA-Seq dataset are considered for validation. Variants from RNA-Seq data were called by GATK best practices 52 for each substrain separately (see also STAR Methods). Validation rate between different categories of variants are compared.…”
Section: Supplemental Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increases the speed of MitoHPC while still retaining sufficient coverage to have confidence in low level (3% variant allele frequency) heteroplasmy calls. We incorporated two programs for calling mtDNA heteroplamic and homoplasmic variants, GATK Mutect2 ( 23 , 24 ) and Mutserve ( 11 ) (Figure 2 ). For the first iteration of variant identification, we used the rCRS as the reference genome, although the RSRS is included as an optional reference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference genome was first indexed with samtools faidx v1.11 (Danecek et al ., 2021) and a sequence dictionary was generated with Picard CreateSequenceDictionary v2.25.6 (https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard). The VCF containing the SV produced from our Nanopore sequencing was also indexed with gatk (Van der Auwera GA & O’Connor BD, 2020) IndexFeatureFile v4.2.0.0 (https://gatk.broadinstitute.org/hc/en-us/articles/360037262651-IndexFeatureFile). FastaAlternateReferenceMaker v4.2.0.0 (https://gatk.broadinstitute.org/hc/en-us/articles/360037594571-FastaAlternateReferenceMaker) was then run with the reference genome and the VCF file to generate a substituted genome representative of our Fragaria accession (Fb2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%