1990
DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(90)90102-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The U.S. DOE least-cost utility planning program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the utility industry, least-cost planning (essentially least life-cycle cost) is widely used for judging system additions or modifications. 23 Along with the EPA, 38 we have recommended life-cycle documentation of emissions. 18 ' 27 In the method developed here, we can account accurately for all GHG emissions that any single technical activity and its supporting infrastructure release to the atmosphere from R&D to final salvage, and for their final decay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the utility industry, least-cost planning (essentially least life-cycle cost) is widely used for judging system additions or modifications. 23 Along with the EPA, 38 we have recommended life-cycle documentation of emissions. 18 ' 27 In the method developed here, we can account accurately for all GHG emissions that any single technical activity and its supporting infrastructure release to the atmosphere from R&D to final salvage, and for their final decay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we present a quantitative method for accounting for all GHGs emitted from technical systems, Copyright 1992-Air & Waste Management Association for the life of each activity, to give decision makers an unambiguous basis for comparing the total greenhouse warming forcing of alternative projects or plans. This method can capture more fully than current methods all source emissions of GHGs from activities that may be separated in space and/or time, and thus characterize more exactly the technical or policy trade-offs available to decision makers who may seek to maximize other goals such as energy efficiency 22 ' 23 or reduction of total costs while minimizing risks associated with global warming. 6 ' 9 We combine known principles to yield an approach that: 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%