2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-012-9384-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The U-WEDGE Transformation Method for Multivariate Geostatistical Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial orthogonality between the components would be assessed using the following measures (Tercan, 1999;Mueller and Ferreira, 2012): Tercan (1999) reported that "the first one compares the absolute sum of the off-diagonal elements of the ICs variogram matrix h IC Γ ( ) with the sum of its diagonal elements for each lag distance, while the second one makes a comparison with the sum of squares of off-diagonal elements of the geochemical variogram matrix h X Γ ( )". As well, for the second measures Tercan (1999) indicated, "the second measure is a spatial extension of the diagonalization efficiency suggested by Xie et al (1995)".…”
Section: Decomposition and Simulation Procedures Of Correlated Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spatial orthogonality between the components would be assessed using the following measures (Tercan, 1999;Mueller and Ferreira, 2012): Tercan (1999) reported that "the first one compares the absolute sum of the off-diagonal elements of the ICs variogram matrix h IC Γ ( ) with the sum of its diagonal elements for each lag distance, while the second one makes a comparison with the sum of squares of off-diagonal elements of the geochemical variogram matrix h X Γ ( )". As well, for the second measures Tercan (1999) indicated, "the second measure is a spatial extension of the diagonalization efficiency suggested by Xie et al (1995)".…”
Section: Decomposition and Simulation Procedures Of Correlated Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include uniformly weighted exhaustive diagonalization (Mueller and Ferreira, 2012;Tichavsky and Yeredor, 2009), simultaneous diagonalization (Tercan, 1999;Xie et al, 1995) and Minimum Spatial Cross-correlation Tercan, 2014a, 2014b). Desbarats and Dimitrakopoulos (2000) and Vargas-Guzman and Dimitrakopoulos (2002) used minimum and maximum autocorrelation factors (MAF) for joint simulation of key geochemical attributes such as copper (Cu), iron (Fe) and potassium (K).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In soil science, single variable simulation methods may be ineffective for generating spatial concentration estimates owing to their inability both to incorporate correlations between variables such as multiple heavy metal concentrations [ 25 ] and to correctly assess the multivariate grade risk [ 26 ]. The method of minimum/maximum autocorrelation factors (MAF) assumes that the semivariogram function of each attribute can be modelled by a bi-structural linear model based on coregionalization, and transforms measured original data into non-orthogonal factors with weak spatial correlations by diagonalizing a pair of symmetrical coregionalization matrices [ 27 ]. Tichavsky and Yeredor presented a more general approach to approximate joint diagonalization (AJD), called Uniformly Weighted Exhaustive Diagonalization with Gauss iterations (U-WEDGE) [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawbacks of the step-wise transformation is the need for a large number of drill-hole data when dealing with several geological attributes; at the same time, being a global and location-independent transformation it suffers from an inherent deconstruction of local spatial connectivity of ranges of grade values of interest. Mueller and Ferreira (2012) present the U-WEDGE transformation approach for multivariate simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%