2017
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx1020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2018 update

Abstract: The UCSC Genome Browser (https://genome.ucsc.edu) provides a web interface for exploring annotated genome assemblies. The assemblies and annotation tracks are updated on an ongoing basis—12 assemblies and more than 28 tracks were added in the past year. Two recent additions are a display of CRISPR/Cas9 guide sequences and an interactive navigator for gene interactions. Other upgrades from the past year include a command-line version of the Variant Annotation Integrator, support for Human Genome Variation Socie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
463
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 484 publications
(465 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
463
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacterial, archaeal and 72 fungal eukaryotic genomes were obtained from NCBI GenBank, and 101 large eukaryotic genomes were obtained from the UCSC Genome Browser (21) and JGI Phytozome (22). The prediction results of specific genomes highlighted in this manuscript are human (GRCh37/hg19 and GRCh38/hg38), mouse (GRCm38/mm10), cat (Felis_catus_9.0), Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288c (GCA_000146045.2/R64), Escherichia coli str.…”
Section: Trnascan-se Prediction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial, archaeal and 72 fungal eukaryotic genomes were obtained from NCBI GenBank, and 101 large eukaryotic genomes were obtained from the UCSC Genome Browser (21) and JGI Phytozome (22). The prediction results of specific genomes highlighted in this manuscript are human (GRCh37/hg19 and GRCh38/hg38), mouse (GRCm38/mm10), cat (Felis_catus_9.0), Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288c (GCA_000146045.2/R64), Escherichia coli str.…”
Section: Trnascan-se Prediction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normalized WIG files were then encoded in bigWig format using the Kent utilities (Rhead et al, 2010). Visual inspection of the data was performed using an Assem-blyHub on the UCSC Genome Browser (Casper et al, 2018). The Versatile Aggregate Profiler (VAP) tool (Coulombe et al, 2014; Brunelle et al, 2015) version 1.1.0 was used to generate the average profile using the following parameters: annotation mode, absolute analysis method, 10 bp windows size, mean aggregate value and smoothing of 6, and missing data were considered as "0".…”
Section: Chip-seq Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that not all of the repeat domains in Xist exhibit conservation across eutherian mammals, we sought to determine whether or not the repeat domains in koala Rsx were conserved in another marsupial. Rsx was originally identified in opossum (Grant et al, 2012), but the most current assembly of the opossum genome (mondom5; (Casper et al, 2018)) harbors significant gaps within the sequence of Rsx.…”
Section: Conservation Of Repeat Domains Between Koala and Opossum Rsxmentioning
confidence: 99%