Environmental Impact of Nuclear Power 1981
DOI: 10.1680/teionp.44333.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The UK disposal of solid radioactive waste into the Atlantic Ocean and its environmental impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of these maximizing assumptions and others elsewhere in both parts of the model (oceanographic and radiological), the doses that would result from release rates at the limits calculated would in prr_ctice probably be very much less than the dose 1 imit [e.g., 5 mSv (500 mrem) forth~ whole body]. This is confirmed in the case of radium-2?6, for example, for which the release rate limit is of the same order as the natural production rate; while the natural dose rntes from marine radium-2?6 are known to be much less tb~n the ICRP dose limi~ (Mitchell and Shepherd 1981).…”
Section: Radioloqical Componentmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Because of these maximizing assumptions and others elsewhere in both parts of the model (oceanographic and radiological), the doses that would result from release rates at the limits calculated would in prr_ctice probably be very much less than the dose 1 imit [e.g., 5 mSv (500 mrem) forth~ whole body]. This is confirmed in the case of radium-2?6, for example, for which the release rate limit is of the same order as the natural production rate; while the natural dose rntes from marine radium-2?6 are known to be much less tb~n the ICRP dose limi~ (Mitchell and Shepherd 1981).…”
Section: Radioloqical Componentmentioning
confidence: 74%