1999
DOI: 10.1006/game.1998.0669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ultimatum Game: Optimal Strategies without Fairness

Abstract: Abstract:The Ultimatum game is simple and this facilitates its use in the study of how it is generated by expectations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Burnell et. al., have researched the optimal strategies without fairness when the Repeated Ultimatum Game is played [23] and Oosterbeek found common behavioural patterns regardless of cultural differences in a meta analysis into the Repeated Ultimatum Game [24]. Besides, individual di↵erences related with reputation [25], attractiveness [26], and the strategies displayed during the Ultimatum Game (UG) have been studied in depth in the economics field.…”
Section: Alternated Repeated Ultimatum Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Burnell et. al., have researched the optimal strategies without fairness when the Repeated Ultimatum Game is played [23] and Oosterbeek found common behavioural patterns regardless of cultural differences in a meta analysis into the Repeated Ultimatum Game [24]. Besides, individual di↵erences related with reputation [25], attractiveness [26], and the strategies displayed during the Ultimatum Game (UG) have been studied in depth in the economics field.…”
Section: Alternated Repeated Ultimatum Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to explain ultimatum outcomes without "fairness," Burnell, Evans, and Yao (1999) use these preferences with β = 0.…”
Section: Outcome-based Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Page et al surveyed that "some 60∼80% of proponents offer fractions between 0.4 and 0.5, and only 3% offer less than 0.2. They are well advised to do this-indeed, some 50% of respondents reject any split offering them less than one-third of the sum" [7,[13][14][15]. It seems discrepancy between game theory and experimental data results from the notion of fairness and the absence of common knowledge of rationality [16][17][18].…”
Section: Sequential Bargaining Gamementioning
confidence: 99%