2014),"First steps into the metaphoric wilderness of macroeconomics", On the Horizon, Vol. 22 Iss 4 pp. 229-238 http:// dx.(2014),"Crisis perception in financial media discourse: a concrete application using the Minskian/mainstream opposition", On the Horizon, Vol. 22 Iss 4 pp. 280-296 http://dx.Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:333301 []
For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
AbstractPurpose -The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate a particular shift in the language used in economic policy debates since the late 1970s. We call this phenomenon the "financialization of public discourse", which refers to the use of particular metaphors and linguistic styles that are friendly to the economic interest of the financial industry. Design/methodology/approach -We used a rhetorical analysis to discover and analyze the specific cases which exemplify what we call the financialization of public discourse. A case study, the USA Treasury's justification for its AIG policy, is used to strengthen the thesis of the paper. Findings -As the AIG case helps demonstrate, the language of finance limits the policy conversation and disguises the fact that the government's role in this case is not different than its overall collective risk management function. Research limitations/implications -We assume that framing of economic events helps shape public perceptions of the desirability of various policies. This prediction, although reasonable, should be supported with more direct evidence. Practical implications -This paper intends to articulate a vital risk management role that the government plays in the economy. Specifically, the government is strongly suited to spreading the consequences of aggregate risk over time and thereby insulating the individuals from drastic fluctuations in their welfare. Our approach could potentially inform an array of public policies. Originality/value -The rhetorical strategies that policy makers use to justify their policy positions and their consequences have been certainly under-researched, particularly in economics. This paper intends to fill this gap in the literature.