Globalizing Cities 2000
DOI: 10.1002/9780470712887.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unavoidable Continuities of the City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
9

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The process of buffer zone development produces communities that are immediately linked to both the core and periphery. These communities are not static, nor are urban spatial hierarchies more generally (Beauregard and Haila 2000). What paths will these communities take over time?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The process of buffer zone development produces communities that are immediately linked to both the core and periphery. These communities are not static, nor are urban spatial hierarchies more generally (Beauregard and Haila 2000). What paths will these communities take over time?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Strategies in the name of permanent possibility Whilst the spatial form of the city is never historically complete and also contains 'unavoidable continuities' (Beauregard and Haila, 2000), a difference from these earlier accounts to those in this special edition is that they are characterised by an increase in the intensity of oscillations between continuity and discontinuity. The articles frame the city as a site of dynamic encounters between cooperation and competition, with the former providing the basis of solidarity among social groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Actions, whether public or private, that cross spatial scales and jurisdictional boundaries are left as externalities. Most importantly, local planners are vulnerable to private-sector actors who operate in multiple places, promise growth and prosperity, and have independent access to political leaders (Beauregard & Haila, 2000;Fainstein, 2001). Local planners are limited by the high value placed on individual property rights, even as they encroach on them through zoning, environmental regulations, eminent domain, and transportation planning.…”
Section: Downloaded By [George Mason University] At 19:57 02 January mentioning
confidence: 99%