The Underground Space Use Right Registration with the Approach of 3 Dimensional Cadastre Concept

Leksono, Bambang Edhi; Ristiawan, Andi; Sadikin, Hendriatiningsih; Meyke, Lucy

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51216-7_11

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Appropriate legislation can help to prevent boundary disputes and clarify the real extent of ownership RRRs in underground environments (Figure 3). Current legislation is mostly relevant to the ground surface; they have some limitations for registering and managing underground spaces [18,[29][30][31]. There are still some challenges that should be addressed to modernise ULA [4].…”

Section: Legal Aspectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are still some challenges that should be addressed to modernise ULA [4]. Therefore, it is important to Current legislation is mostly relevant to the ground surface; they have some limitations for registering and managing underground spaces [18,[29][30][31]. There are still some challenges that should be addressed to modernise ULA [4].…”

Section: Legal Aspectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions

Saeidian

Rajabifard

Atazadeh

et al. 2021

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development and use of underground space is a necessity for most cities in response to rapid urbanisation. Effective underground land administration is critical for sustainable urban development. From a land administration perspective, the ownership extent of underground assets is essential for planning and managing underground areas. In some jurisdictions, physical structures (e.g., walls, ceilings, and utilities) are also necessary to delineate the ownership extent of underground assets. The current practice of underground land administration focuses on the ownership of underground space and mostly relies on 2D survey plans. This inefficient and fragmented 2D-based underground data management and communication results in several issues including boundary disputes, underground strikes, delays and disruptions in projects, economic losses, and urban planning issues. This study provides a review of underground land administration from three common aspects: legal, institutional, and technical. A range of important challenges have been identified based on the current research and practice. To address these challenges, the authors of this study propose a new framework for 3D underground land administration. The proposed framework outlines the future research directions to upgrade underground land administration using integrated 3D digital approaches.

show abstract