1998
DOI: 10.2307/3666413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Underinvestment Problem and Corporate Derivatives Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
186
1
21

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
10
186
1
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Gay and Nam (1998) agree with previous studies (Nance et al, 1993 andFroot et al, 1993) which outlined that derivatives use increases while liquidity increases and the opposite. However, Nguyen and Faff (2002) argue with their findings.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, Gay and Nam (1998) agree with previous studies (Nance et al, 1993 andFroot et al, 1993) which outlined that derivatives use increases while liquidity increases and the opposite. However, Nguyen and Faff (2002) argue with their findings.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…When in financial distress, growth options are likely to be undervalued and that distress may lead to underinvestment in profitable growth opportunities. When growth firms have limited access to financial markets, they may face higher costs in raising external capital, perhaps due to the asymmetric information surrounding these growth options, in a period of time when steadier streams of cash flows are desired (see Froot, Scharfstein, and Stein, 1993;Gay and Nam, 1998). We hypothesize that the firms with greater growth options will have a positive abnormal return around hiring announcements of CROs.…”
Section: Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, stock returns are the most appropriate proxy of firm performance for all-equity firms (Mehran, 1995) because a firms' stock price reflects the value of its future earnings, both from existing assets and their expected growth (Gay and Nam, 1998;Tufano, 1996). Several previous papers have indicated that a firm's total assets (TA) can be taken as a proxy for firm size (Berger and Ofek, 1995;Zhou, 2003;Zimmerman, 1983).…”
Section: Proxy Variables For Firm Size and Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%