2016
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0320-0.ch020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Understanding of Public Service Ethics in Turkish Municipalities

Abstract: Recent legal regulations provided more authorities and resources to municipalities, meanwhile corruption and unethical conduct cases were experienced more in the municipalities in Turkey. This paper aimed to detect the “public service ethics understanding” of municipality administrators in Turkey. To this end, a questionnaire was conducted among elected and appointed administrators of 9 urban-district municipalities in Ankara. Although the majority of municipality administrators agree that institutions and leg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among others, Persson et al (2013) maintained that initiatives intended to fight public corruption are flawed by the lack of understanding of this phenomenon as a collective action problem. As a consequence of this, anti-corruption interventions are generally scattered and poorly integrated; on the opposite, they mostly focus on specific determinants of public corruption, such as lack of transparency (Ciasullo et al , 2017), inappropriate human resource management tools (van der Wal et al , 2016), inadequate user engagement in public value co-creation (Rosenbloom and Gong, 2013) and defective organizational ethics (Sadioglu and Omurgonulsen, 2016). From this point of view, it is not surprising that scholars and practitioners are still quarrelling to pinpoint the ingredients of the recipe for effective anti-corruption initiatives (Petrucelli and Peters, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among others, Persson et al (2013) maintained that initiatives intended to fight public corruption are flawed by the lack of understanding of this phenomenon as a collective action problem. As a consequence of this, anti-corruption interventions are generally scattered and poorly integrated; on the opposite, they mostly focus on specific determinants of public corruption, such as lack of transparency (Ciasullo et al , 2017), inappropriate human resource management tools (van der Wal et al , 2016), inadequate user engagement in public value co-creation (Rosenbloom and Gong, 2013) and defective organizational ethics (Sadioglu and Omurgonulsen, 2016). From this point of view, it is not surprising that scholars and practitioners are still quarrelling to pinpoint the ingredients of the recipe for effective anti-corruption initiatives (Petrucelli and Peters, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%