The Uneven Impact of Neoliberalism on Housing Opportunities

Abstract

Neoliberalism has dominated policy discourse and policy formulation for at least two decades and has been particularly influential in reshaping housing systems and housing opportunities. The timing, pace and impact of these policy developments have, however, varied between and within societies. This article explores the experiences of Japan and the UK as a way of illustrating that while there has been a shared discourse of neoliberalism, there have been important contextual differences in relation to the economic cycle, welfare systems and political complexion. These have affected the progress and development of neoliberal policy reforms in housing and in other related spheres and the extent of global financial integration. In both countries, a key social change is the striking reduction in levels of home ownership among younger age groups. The article explores the common and different causes and consequences of these trends and points to the significance of these emerging generational fissions for the neoliberal project. Copyright (c) 2009 The Authors. Journal Compilation (c) 2009 Joint Editors and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

‘Generation rent’ and the ability to ‘settle down’: economic and geographical variation in young people’s housing transitions

“…This expansion of the PRS reflects broader processes of neoliberal welfare state restructuring that have gathered pace in the UK, and internationally, since the 1980s. These processes have reduced the welfare safety-net for citizens, requiring them instead to take responsibility for their own life outcomes through the market (Kemp, 2015;McKee, 2012;Forrest and Hirayama, 2009). …”

Japanese Cities in Chinese Perspective: Towards a Contextual, Regional Approach to Comparative Urbanism

“…Indeed, some of the most rewarding comparative work involving Japanese cities has been strategic in its scope, contrasting developments in Japan and in the West to advance a specific argument (Forrest and Hirayama, 2009;Fielding, 2004;Jacobs, 2003). The same is true of some recent work on Chinese cities (Logan, 2008;Chen, 2009;.…”

An Introduction to the Special Issue – Housing in Hard Times: Marginality, Inequality and Class

“…As discussed further by several authors in this special issue, there is considerable concern that this rolling back of the state will lead to the poor and vulnerable paying the highest price for the economic crisis, for example through the provisions of the UK Welfare Reform Act 2012. The housing impacts of this shift include the ongoing marketisation of housing provision through the continued promotion of homeownership at the margins through 'affordable' housing (Forrest and Hirayama, 2009;Whitehead and Williams, 2011;CLG, 2011a); increased rents for new social housing (Pawson and Wilcox, 2011); and more use of the private rented sector for meeting housing need (e.g. CLG, 2011b) all as part of moving further towards an asset-based welfare state underpinned by private homeownership (Lowe, 2011;Ronald and Elsinga, 2012;McKee, In Press).…”