2022
DOI: 10.1177/21568693221100171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Uneven Stress of Social Change: Disruptions, Disparities, and Mental Health

Abstract: As the COVID-19 pandemic underscores, disparities in stress exposure, vulnerability, and protective resources are often magnified in times of rapid change. I argue that Leonard Pearlin’s integration of life course and stress process frameworks constitutes a useful model for advancing a research agenda on the stressors and corollary mental health impacts of the social disruptions and dislocations defining life in the early twenty-first century. Social changes interrupt life paths and produce potentially stressf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
34
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
0
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In his conceptualization of stress process theory, Pearlin (1989) emphasizes the importance of macro-level structural arrangements and changes in them as contributing to disparities in the risks of stress exposure (Pearlin 1989; also see Fenwick and Tausig 1994; Moen 2022; Wheaton et al 2013). Thus, stress process theory posits that macro-level contexts and changes can upend existing arrangements and needed resources, reducing well-being by eliciting discomfort and negative emotions (Pearlin and Bierman 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his conceptualization of stress process theory, Pearlin (1989) emphasizes the importance of macro-level structural arrangements and changes in them as contributing to disparities in the risks of stress exposure (Pearlin 1989; also see Fenwick and Tausig 1994; Moen 2022; Wheaton et al 2013). Thus, stress process theory posits that macro-level contexts and changes can upend existing arrangements and needed resources, reducing well-being by eliciting discomfort and negative emotions (Pearlin and Bierman 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decades of research have established the noxious impact of stressors on mental health, with a great deal of scholarly attention documenting the impact of chronic stressors, traumatic stressors, and discrimination on health and well-being ( Pearlin and Bierman 2013 ; J. Taylor and Turner 2002 ; Turner and Lloyd 1995 ; Williams 2018 ). The burgeoning study of pandemic stressors and mental health has sparked new interest in the stress process by confirming and extending the general patterns of pre-pandemic research ( Bierman, Upenieks, Glavin, and Schieman 2021 ; Donnelly and Farina 2021 ; Grace 2021 ; Grace and VanHeuvelen 2022 ; Moen 2022 ; Qian and Fan 2022 ; Witteveen and Velthorst 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The COVID-19 pandemic has driven a global expansion of social stress. The highly contagious and deadly nature of the coronavirus combined with sudden lockdowns, social distancing measures, and economic shutdowns have contributed to widespread insecurity and psychological distress ( Bierman and Schieman 2020 ; Bierman, Upenieks, Glavin, and Schieman 2021 ; Donnelly and Farina 2021 ; Moen 2022 ; Zheng et al 2021 ). With this in mind, it should come as no surprise that scholars have documented a rising incidence of mental health issues in the U.S. population over the course of the pandemic ( McGinty et al 2020 , 2022 ; Tran et al 2022 ; Twenge, McAllister, and Joiner 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Stress Process Model (SPM) offers theoretical insights. Pearlin and colleagues ( 1981 ) argued that when a disruptive event occurs, individuals often struggle to re-establish homeostasis (Pearlin and Bierman, 2013 ; Moen, 2022 ). A disruptive job event can be classified as a stressor—one that might elevate distress if it “is involuntary, undesired, and unscheduled” ( Pearlin et al, 1981 :343).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%