2021
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhab031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unintended Consequences of Corporate Bond ETFs: Evidence from the Taper Tantrum

Abstract: This paper examines whether ETFs are a unique source of corporate bond fragility. Relative to mutual funds, ETFs cater to high-liquidity-demand investors, facilitate positive feedback strategies, and transmit outflows to corporate bonds via near-proportional trading. Comparing yield spread changes of bonds from the same issuer, we show that ETFs create flow-induced pressure during the Taper Tantrum, a period of market turmoil. Redemptions used to maintain the relative price efficiency of the largest and most l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we conduct the main analyses with net profit margin as an alternative proxy for firm performance and also use the natural logarithm of our ETFs concentration measures. To address that Vanguard ETFs are share classes of the index fund, we identify 38 Vanguard ETFs in our sample and reconstruct our ETFs concentration measures excluding those Vanguard ETFs in a similar way to Elton et al (2019) and Dannhauser and Hoseinzade (2022). Our original results remain robust in all these cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we conduct the main analyses with net profit margin as an alternative proxy for firm performance and also use the natural logarithm of our ETFs concentration measures. To address that Vanguard ETFs are share classes of the index fund, we identify 38 Vanguard ETFs in our sample and reconstruct our ETFs concentration measures excluding those Vanguard ETFs in a similar way to Elton et al (2019) and Dannhauser and Hoseinzade (2022). Our original results remain robust in all these cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamm (2014) finds that ETFs can deteriorate liquidity for their investees. C. Dannhauser and Hoseinzade (2021) find that the unique features of corporate bond ETFs, that is, in‐kind creation and redemption mechanisms and the exacerbation of the liquidity mismatch in periods of stress, that heighten the extent of liquidity transformation are a unique source of fragility for corporate bond markets.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamm (2014) finds that ETFs can deteriorate liquidity for their investees. C. Dannhauser and Hoseinzade (2021) find that the unique features of corporate bond ETFs, that is, in-kind creation and redemption mechanisms and the exacerbation of the liquidity mismatch in periods of stress, that heighten the extent of liquidity transformation are a unique source of fragility for corporate bond markets.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%