2020
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.2020.1776203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unintended Effect of Perceived Transformational Leadership Style on Workaholism: The Mediating Role of Work Motivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the negative effects of perceived supervisor support on employees' global levels of workaholism matched our expectations (Gillet et al, 2018;Sandrin, Gillet, Fernet, Depint-Rouault, et al, 2019), the positive effects of employees' global levels of self-determined work motivation on their global levels of workaholism were not aligned with our expectations. However, although the bulk of prior research does support the idea that workaholism tends to be mainly driven by controlled types of motivation (van Beek et al, 2011), other studies have also revealed, like Study 1, positive associations between self-determined work motivation and workaholism (Endriulaitienė & Morkevičiūtė, 2020). These results thus suggest that the motivational pattern that underpins workaholism might be more complex than previously thought, and might involve a combination of autonomous and controlled forms of motivation (Van den Broeck et al, 2011).…”
Section: Workaholism As a Multidimensional Constructmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the negative effects of perceived supervisor support on employees' global levels of workaholism matched our expectations (Gillet et al, 2018;Sandrin, Gillet, Fernet, Depint-Rouault, et al, 2019), the positive effects of employees' global levels of self-determined work motivation on their global levels of workaholism were not aligned with our expectations. However, although the bulk of prior research does support the idea that workaholism tends to be mainly driven by controlled types of motivation (van Beek et al, 2011), other studies have also revealed, like Study 1, positive associations between self-determined work motivation and workaholism (Endriulaitienė & Morkevičiūtė, 2020). These results thus suggest that the motivational pattern that underpins workaholism might be more complex than previously thought, and might involve a combination of autonomous and controlled forms of motivation (Van den Broeck et al, 2011).…”
Section: Workaholism As a Multidimensional Constructmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, workaholics are assumed to be stimulated by internal and external contingencies, such as gaining their supervisors' approval, peer admiration, and prestige (Spence & Robbins, 1992). This is evidenced by their tendency to invest efforts in activities that are more likely to lead to promotions, pay rises, or other forms of recognition (Endriulaitienė & Morkevičiūtė, 2020). Moreover, for workaholics, excessive investment in work is also purported to represent a way to decrease their feelings of anxiety, guilt, and shame, and to increase their self-esteem (Porter, 2004).…”
Section: Workaholism Dimensionality and Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More precisely, workaholics are assumed to be stimulated by internal (e.g., feeling negative emotions when not working) and external (e.g., gaining peer admiration and prestige) motivating factors (Spence & Robbins, 1992). This is evidenced by their tendency to invest efforts in activities that are more likely to lead to promotions, raises, or other external forms of recognition (Endriulaitienė & Morkevičiūtė, 2020). Moreover, for nurses with high levels of presenteeism and workaholism, excessive investment in work is also purported to represent a way to decrease their feelings of anxiety, guilt, and shame, and to protect their contingent self-esteem (Porter, 2004;Ryan & Deci, 2017).…”
Section: Interaction Between Workaholism and Presenteeismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normality of the data was assessed using skewness and kurtosis values. All models were estimated using Mplus 8.4 (Muthén & Muthén, 2019) robust maximum likelihood estimator (MLR) in conjunction with Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML; Enders, 2010) procedures to handle the limited amount of missing data present in this study (i.e., 0-1.2%). First, we tested a measurement model including workaholism, presenteeism and WFC.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%