2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00373-016-1701-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Union-Closed Sets Conjecture for Small Families

Abstract: We prove that the union-closed sets conjecture is true for separatingwhere m denotes the number of elements in A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more details on the development of the conjecture and what is known about it see the survey [7]. In the recent years [1,2,6,12,18,21,28,29,30] have further been published investigating the conjecture with respect to one aspect or another. In this context, the collaborative effort in [16] should also be mentioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more details on the development of the conjecture and what is known about it see the survey [7]. In the recent years [1,2,6,12,18,21,28,29,30] have further been published investigating the conjecture with respect to one aspect or another. In this context, the collaborative effort in [16] should also be mentioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Falgas-Ravry [7] showed that the conjecture holds for any separating union-closed family F with a universe of n elements with at most 2n elements (separating here means that no two distinct elements i, j ∈ [n] appear in exactly the same sets in F ). This was slightly improved by Maßberg [16], from 2n to 2(n + n log 2 n−log log 2 n ). Interestingly, Hu [10] proved that if this bound can be improved to (2 + c)n for some constant c > 0 , this already implies that any union-closed family F has an element appearing in at least c−2 2(c−1) |F | sets in F .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%