The unique chinese innovation pathways: Lessons from chinese small and mediuem sized manufacturing firms

Abstract

Many researchers equate the development of Chinese product innovation capabilities to Japanese and South Korean's development paths, that is, from imitation to innovation. Nonetheless, today many Chinese products have competed successfully in the global markets in terms of speed, cost, quality, and innovativeness. China's product innovation performance has gained the world's recognition. The performance of some industrial areas have also outperformed Japan and South Korea. This paper aims to understand and identify the unique phases of Chinese innovation. We collected empirical data from field studies and interviews with managers of ten small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the Suzhou province of China. The research shows three unique Chinese innovation phases that are distinctive from the Japanese and South Korean.The results provided interesting insights into how Chinese SMEs in different industries cultivated their skills and knowledge under the three unique phases. We believe the findings contribute towards a better understanding of Chinese innovation in the context of China's evolving institutions and growing firm capabilities. Moreover, findings from this research help to shed light on existing debates for the unique Chinese innovation pathways.

The Role of Chinese Small and Medium TNCs in the Modernization of the National Economy

“…3) Прямые контакты с клиентами помогают совершенствованию продукции и НИС. Исследователи выявили, что в отличие от японских и корейских, китайские малые предприятия совершенствуют продукцию, главным образом, опираясь на отзывы пользователей, а не на результаты НИОКР (Chung, Tan 2017). 4) Появляется возможность заниматься послепродажным сервисным обслуживанием и обновлять программное обеспечение, необходимое для современной продукции Интернета вещей.…”

The process of buyer-supplier collaboration to innovation: a study of Brazil-China electronics industry

“…In opposition, most of the large and high-tech companies have product development initiatives on their own. One of the reasons for this movement is the cooperation with large Chinese universities as well as greater interaction with Chinese and international clients (Chung & Tan, 2017). Therefore, for the same product line, it seems to be strategic for Company I to balance the purchasing portfolio with companies of different sizes to maintain its competitiveness and absorb product innovations.…”

Contemplating the Impact of the Moderators Agency Cost and Number of Supervisors on Corporate Sustainability Under the Aegis of a Cognitive CEO

“…Prior studies have enunciated on the innovative capabilities of SMEs (Newman et al, 2015;Chung and Tan, 2017;Gentile-Lüdecke et al, 2019;Mei et al, 2019;Xiang et al, 2019), but few studies have revealed the effect of corporate governance on SME performance (Hsu et al, 2013;Shapiro et al, 2015;Ge et al, 2019;Bauweraerts, 2020). Despite this enormous body of research, the cognition of the CEO has been little explored, though this can boost the firm's growth and maintain sustainable corporate growth.…”